![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Good afternoon, Sydney.
I think we are both on the "same page" and if not, at least we are getting there :-). If you go to an aviation book store, don't look for a book authored by me - you won't find one :-). I can't personally imagine that I would approach an airport where other planes are already landing in the pattern, listen to AWOS or look at the wind sock and decide that the wind favors a different runway, and then make an announcement about "preferred runway now so and so". Nor would I. I'm sorry if that was the impression I gave. I have made that announcement when in the pattern or on the ground and noticed the change in the windsock and even then not before confirming the wind change with AWOS. So far, no one that was in the pattern with me has objected to the announcement or refused to make an adjustment. In fact, several have responded with a quick "thank you, changing to runway XX". ......If several planes are established in the pattern for one runway, I'm not sure it's the safest course of action for them all to switch. On one ocassion there were 3 of us and we all switched without any problem. I would submit that either everyone changes or no one changes and it has nothing to do with who noticed/announced the wind direction change; it has to do with safety. But thank you, I think I understand your concern now; you're worried that someone will think the AWOS is wrong and the wind favors the runway you're using? I'll consider that -- it may be a valid point worth a couple words. That is correct. OTOH, I really feel there are a number of valid reasons to choose the runway which is not aligned with the wind and not all of them lend themselves to two-word radio calls. Oh, absolutely. I completely agree. And be assured that I NEVER us a non-preferred runway for x-wind practice when other aircraft are using the field OK, so this answers the question I asked you earlier. You said you would never do x-wind practice when the airport is "busy". I asked "what do you consider busy?". If you got the idea that my definition of "busy" should be the universal definition, I'm sorry I gave that impression. My definition is MY definition and certainly subject to change given the situation. What I mean is there is no standard or set parameters that determine when an aiport is busy. For me, I take into consideration the number of aircraft, the types of flying being done, the weather, and how I feel at that moment. Now it looks like your answer is, you would never do crosswind practice when there is one other aircraft in the pattern or approaching the airport to land. If I had to use a non-preferred runway for the practice - that is correct. When there are other aircraft in the pattern or soon will be in the pattern, everyone has to work together or there will be a great potential for unexpected "opportunities." If I understand you correctly, if you're already in the pattern, and someone else approaches the airport and announces "wind from 300 preferred runway now 270" you would break off your pattern and join the pattern for the other runway and land there. That is correct in part. I have never heard that announcment made by someone approaching the airport. Unless they had been listening to AWOS for a while, they wouldn't know the wind had changed. They would hear the wind direction and then they would decide on the appropriate runway. The announcement would be made by someone already in the pattern. And if I were in the pattern when someone else made that announcement, I would make the necessary adjustments in order to use the preferred runway. Of course if a airplane was approaching the airport, listened to AWOS, and then heard "me" say I am using runway 27 when the wind direction favors 32, they certainly have the opportunity to contact me for clarification. If that were to happen, I would evaluate where they are in relation to the airport, where I am in relation to the pattern, and then either abort my pattern for the non-preferred runway or continue with my landing and then switch to the preferred runway. For example, if a pilot announces they are 7 miles out and I am on my downwind, base, or final leg, I have plenty of time to make my landing. On the other hand, if I notice a NORAD entering the downwind pattern for the preferred runway, I will abort my pattern and adjust to the perferred runway. When I fly, I fly with other pilots in the sky. I will not do anything that jeperdizes either their safety nor mine - at least intentionally :-). Well, I would say the same. But clearly I do some things differently and see some things differently. And there are other pilots who do and see things still differently from both of us. And that in part is what makes flying an adventure :-). Your comment is underscored with the number of aviation "how-to" books on the market and they are all by different authors. No, flying is not a "one size fits all." We have parameters that we need to stay within and guidelines to help in that endeavor. A real example of the accuracy of your comment is encounted when you fly with different CFIs and everyone has a slightly different approach to landing an airplane and then along comes the DE with a DIFFERENT idea on how landings should be approached (I know...been there, done that). I think the problem arises when some people take the attitude that they have the book on safety and anyone who sees things differently is "jeopardizing their safety or mine". Please note I'm not saying I see this attitude from you in what you're writing here, just that I see this attitude as a problem in and of itself. True, so true. Well, I hope we are coming to some conclusion here. I have enjoyed this exchange of comments and views. Certainly with only 130 hours of flying I am no "expert" on what should or shouldn't be done. But that is why I hang out in this and the RAS newsgroup...to learn and to share. I think we all have something to contribute; good, bad, or indifferent. :-) I am lucky, I guess, where I do my flying. While I fly out of a Class-C airport, most of the PP training takes place at several different uncontrolled airports in our area. When I did my training I did it during the week. Fortunately, there were MANY times when I was the only airplane in the pattern. In fact, even now, the flying I do is done during the week. It's almost like having your own private airport regardless where you go. Happy and safe flying. Harry |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NAS and associated computer system | Newps | Instrument Flight Rules | 8 | August 12th 04 05:12 AM |
Rules on what can be in a hangar | Brett Justus | Owning | 13 | February 27th 04 05:35 PM |
Here's the Recompiled List of 82 Aircraft Accessible Aviation Museums! | Jay Honeck | Home Built | 18 | January 20th 04 04:02 PM |
Here's the Recompiled List of 82 Aircraft Accessible Aviation Museums! | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 16 | January 20th 04 04:02 PM |
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons | Curtl33 | General Aviation | 7 | January 9th 04 11:35 PM |