A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Non-TW CFI cannot give Flight Review in TW



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 17th 04, 09:38 AM
Hilton
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Michael wrote:
Just because Lynch says it don't make it so. This has been
demonstrated to everyone's satisfaction multiple times. The FAQ is
neither regulatory nor authoritative.


FWIW: After posting I thought I should have said: "I'm just the messenger
here."

The FAQ is a great idea, if only 'they' could get it right... :|

Hilton


  #2  
Old January 19th 04, 01:11 AM
Michael
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Hilton" wrote
FWIW: After posting I thought I should have said: "I'm just the messenger
here."


I'm sorry if I sounded like I was taking issue with you. That was not
the intent. The problem is Lynch.

The FAQ is a great idea, if only 'they' could get it right... :|


That's a good general description of the FAA, not just that particular
FAQ. Usually, the FAA acts only when there is a real problem (some
call this regulation by body count...). It's pretty rare for the FAA
to do something for no reason at all.

However, when they do something they usually fail to fix the problem,
and only succeed in causing more problems.

Lynch's FAQ is a perfect example. Problem: The FAR's are complex and
difficult to understand. Many people (especially those who are not
lawyers) have a hard time interpreting them and determining if a given
operation is legal. A list of frequently asked questions and
AUTHORITATIVE answers is a great idea. Therefore, Lynch starts the
FAQ.

Unfortunately, it is neither authoritative nor correct. Therefore,
the problem is in no way diminished. What's worse, we now have
blatant misinterpretations floating around. Thus the situation is
made even worse than if Lynch had done nothing.

Michael
  #3  
Old January 19th 04, 10:31 PM
Stevenatherton
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Non-TW CFI cannot give Flight Review in TW

wheres tw and why not
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 02:26 PM
NAS and associated computer system Newps Instrument Flight Rules 8 August 12th 04 05:12 AM
Canadian IFR/VFR Flight Plan gwengler Instrument Flight Rules 4 August 11th 04 03:55 AM
Diamond DA-40 with G-1000 pirep C J Campbell Instrument Flight Rules 117 July 22nd 04 05:40 PM
12 Dec 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News Otis Willie Naval Aviation 0 December 12th 03 11:01 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.