![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Michael wrote:
Just because Lynch says it don't make it so. This has been demonstrated to everyone's satisfaction multiple times. The FAQ is neither regulatory nor authoritative. FWIW: After posting I thought I should have said: "I'm just the messenger here." ![]() The FAQ is a great idea, if only 'they' could get it right... :| Hilton |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Hilton" wrote
FWIW: After posting I thought I should have said: "I'm just the messenger here." ![]() I'm sorry if I sounded like I was taking issue with you. That was not the intent. The problem is Lynch. The FAQ is a great idea, if only 'they' could get it right... :| That's a good general description of the FAA, not just that particular FAQ. Usually, the FAA acts only when there is a real problem (some call this regulation by body count...). It's pretty rare for the FAA to do something for no reason at all. However, when they do something they usually fail to fix the problem, and only succeed in causing more problems. Lynch's FAQ is a perfect example. Problem: The FAR's are complex and difficult to understand. Many people (especially those who are not lawyers) have a hard time interpreting them and determining if a given operation is legal. A list of frequently asked questions and AUTHORITATIVE answers is a great idea. Therefore, Lynch starts the FAQ. Unfortunately, it is neither authoritative nor correct. Therefore, the problem is in no way diminished. What's worse, we now have blatant misinterpretations floating around. Thus the situation is made even worse than if Lynch had done nothing. Michael |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Non-TW CFI cannot give Flight Review in TW
wheres tw and why not |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
NAS and associated computer system | Newps | Instrument Flight Rules | 8 | August 12th 04 05:12 AM |
Canadian IFR/VFR Flight Plan | gwengler | Instrument Flight Rules | 4 | August 11th 04 03:55 AM |
Diamond DA-40 with G-1000 pirep | C J Campbell | Instrument Flight Rules | 117 | July 22nd 04 05:40 PM |
12 Dec 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News | Otis Willie | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 12th 03 11:01 PM |