![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "David Reinhart" wrote in message ... | I've been using news.google.com to see what kind of reaction the CBS story has | been generating the in the press and the answer is pretty much: zero. | | I agree they're a bunch of jackasses and we should try and get them to change | their tune, but I'm not, at this point, all that concerned about the damage | they've done to GA. I've pummeled them with emails and I have draft responses | ready to go should anything show up in our local papers, etc., but so far | nothing. | I suspect that these stories are a political trial balloon. They will be followed up with polls asking if the public feels safe from small airplanes and if they think the Bush administration should do more to ensure security at small airports. If the polls show that the public is not particularly concerned even after these broadcasts then we will never hear about them. OTOH, if the polls show that the public is sensitive about this issue, watch for more polls questioning the administration's competence on national security. Democratic candidates will begin talking about how the Bush administration is doing a poor job in securing small airports and that the war in Iraq is draining money that should be used for security instead. Expect minor candidates to bring up the issue first. If it affects the polls, then major candidates will trot out sympathetic pilots who will demand that the government do something to protect our airplanes and our airports. It may never become a major campaign issue, but it might get brief mention in advertisements critical of the Bush administration. If the Democrats win, then they will fulfill their campaign promises by providing some kind of aid for small airports, probably in the form of loans to buy fencing, gates, prop locks and the like. Or perhaps the Republicans will develop similar aid programs just to show that they are doing something. IOW the pilots and airports will still have to pay for it, but the politicians will take all the credit. Expect insurance rates to go up at airfields that have less security, too. So you see that it really does not matter much what the public believes. Sooner or later a lot of time and effort will be spent on small airport security and we will have to pay for it ourselves even as the government says it is helping us. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() C J Campbell wrote: If the Democrats win, then they will fulfill their campaign promises by providing some kind of aid for small airports, probably in the form of loans to buy fencing, gates, prop locks and the like. Not if the Dems in Massachusetts and New Jersey are any indication. They just order the aircraft owners and/or airports to buy and install the stuff. George Patterson Great discoveries are not announced with "Eureka!". What's usually said is "Hummmmm... That's interesting...." |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
American nazi pond scum, version two | bushite kills bushite | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 21st 04 10:46 PM |
Hey! What fun!! Let's let them kill ourselves!!! | [email protected] | Naval Aviation | 2 | December 17th 04 09:45 PM |
15 Dec 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News | Otis Willie | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 15th 03 10:01 PM |
15 Dec 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | December 15th 03 10:01 PM |
08 Dec 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News | Otis Willie | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 8th 03 11:28 PM |