![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Teachers I have talked too care less about the money and more about the fact
that they have ZERO control in the classroom. The students have a right to do whatever they please wthout recourse. Only the best leaders are capable of controlling a classroom through force of personality. Enough of those people might be recruited with lots more money, but maybe not. The quicker solution is to either bring back corporal punishment and expulsions, or go with vouchers that will allow a free market to separate the children of idiots from the children of responsible parents. "Tom Sixkiller" wrote in message ... "Judah" wrote in message ... "Tom Sixkiller" wrote in : "Jordan" wrote in message ... If we have to have celebrity endorsement, then our nation is too brain dead to endure and is finished. That's what happens when teachers make minimum wage, and celebrities make $100,000 an episode... Teachers hardly make minimun wage. Even if we paid them $100K, they don't know _how_ to teach (besides being beholden to the unions). Further, even those who LOVE to teach, still miss HOW the human mind learns and grasps information in the form of concepts. That's why most all of "education" is now BY ROTE. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dude" wrote in message ... Teachers I have talked too care less about the money and more about the fact that they have ZERO control in the classroom. The students have a right to do whatever they please wthout recourse. Only the best leaders are capable of controlling a classroom through force of personality. Enough of those people might be recruited with lots more money, but maybe not. The quicker solution is to either bring back corporal punishment and expulsions, or go with vouchers that will allow a free market to separate the children of idiots from the children of responsible parents. Right there you hit the nail on the head...kinda. If parents had to pay for their kids education out of THEIR pocket, instead of their neighbors, damn sure they would pay attention to their kids learning and behavior. Ain't going to happen in tax funded schools. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tom,
Making the parents more involved by making them pay would be great, but I am not gonna hold my breath. Also, I am not sure that the end result would be a net improvement. Many parents are such numbskulls that the kids may end up getting even less education. I know what you are thinking, but there is not room in the jails for all the parents who fit this bill. So, I will agree with you in theory, but have to disagree in what is practical (at least until congress is taken over by libertarians). OUT "Tom Sixkiller" wrote in message ... "Dude" wrote in message ... Teachers I have talked too care less about the money and more about the fact that they have ZERO control in the classroom. The students have a right to do whatever they please wthout recourse. Only the best leaders are capable of controlling a classroom through force of personality. Enough of those people might be recruited with lots more money, but maybe not. The quicker solution is to either bring back corporal punishment and expulsions, or go with vouchers that will allow a free market to separate the children of idiots from the children of responsible parents. Right there you hit the nail on the head...kinda. If parents had to pay for their kids education out of THEIR pocket, instead of their neighbors, damn sure they would pay attention to their kids learning and behavior. Ain't going to happen in tax funded schools. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dude" wrote in message ... Tom, Making the parents more involved by making them pay would be great, but I am not gonna hold my breath. Also, I am not sure that the end result would be a net improvement. Many parents are such numbskulls that the kids may end up getting even less education. I know what you are thinking, but there is not room in the jails for all the parents who fit this bill. Jail? How does that fit? So, I will agree with you in theory, but have to disagree in what is practical (at least until congress is taken over by libertarians). Until the majority of people change between their ears, nothing is going to change/improve _politically_. As long as the notion of public schools is predominnt, it will continue its course. "You can't change a country through the politcal process; you can only change people's point-of-view (ie, political views/outlook). OUT "Tom Sixkiller" wrote in message ... "Dude" wrote in message ... Teachers I have talked too care less about the money and more about the fact that they have ZERO control in the classroom. The students have a right to do whatever they please wthout recourse. Only the best leaders are capable of controlling a classroom through force of personality. Enough of those people might be recruited with lots more money, but maybe not. The quicker solution is to either bring back corporal punishment and expulsions, or go with vouchers that will allow a free market to separate the children of idiots from the children of responsible parents. Right there you hit the nail on the head...kinda. If parents had to pay for their kids education out of THEIR pocket, instead of their neighbors, damn sure they would pay attention to their kids learning and behavior. Ain't going to happen in tax funded schools. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I figured you would want to throw parents who wouldn't pay for their kids
education into jail. Looks like it was a bad guess. "Tom Sixkiller" wrote in message ... "Dude" wrote in message ... Tom, Making the parents more involved by making them pay would be great, but I am not gonna hold my breath. Also, I am not sure that the end result would be a net improvement. Many parents are such numbskulls that the kids may end up getting even less education. I know what you are thinking, but there is not room in the jails for all the parents who fit this bill. Jail? How does that fit? So, I will agree with you in theory, but have to disagree in what is practical (at least until congress is taken over by libertarians). Until the majority of people change between their ears, nothing is going to change/improve _politically_. As long as the notion of public schools is predominnt, it will continue its course. "You can't change a country through the politcal process; you can only change people's point-of-view (ie, political views/outlook). OUT "Tom Sixkiller" wrote in message ... "Dude" wrote in message ... Teachers I have talked too care less about the money and more about the fact that they have ZERO control in the classroom. The students have a right to do whatever they please wthout recourse. Only the best leaders are capable of controlling a classroom through force of personality. Enough of those people might be recruited with lots more money, but maybe not. The quicker solution is to either bring back corporal punishment and expulsions, or go with vouchers that will allow a free market to separate the children of idiots from the children of responsible parents. Right there you hit the nail on the head...kinda. If parents had to pay for their kids education out of THEIR pocket, instead of their neighbors, damn sure they would pay attention to their kids learning and behavior. Ain't going to happen in tax funded schools. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dude" wrote in message ... I figured you would want to throw parents who wouldn't pay for their kids education into jail. Looks like it was a bad guess. People would educate their kids that same way the feed them, cloth them, care for their health..the same way they do those things for them now. If they fail to do those things now, we call it...what? "Tom Sixkiller" wrote in message ... "Dude" wrote in message ... Tom, Making the parents more involved by making them pay would be great, but I am not gonna hold my breath. Also, I am not sure that the end result would be a net improvement. Many parents are such numbskulls that the kids may end up getting even less education. I know what you are thinking, but there is not room in the jails for all the parents who fit this bill. Jail? How does that fit? So, I will agree with you in theory, but have to disagree in what is practical (at least until congress is taken over by libertarians). Until the majority of people change between their ears, nothing is going to change/improve _politically_. As long as the notion of public schools is predominnt, it will continue its course. "You can't change a country through the politcal process; you can only change people's point-of-view (ie, political views/outlook). OUT "Tom Sixkiller" wrote in message ... "Dude" wrote in message ... Teachers I have talked too care less about the money and more about the fact that they have ZERO control in the classroom. The students have a right to do whatever they please wthout recourse. Only the best leaders are capable of controlling a classroom through force of personality. Enough of those people might be recruited with lots more money, but maybe not. The quicker solution is to either bring back corporal punishment and expulsions, or go with vouchers that will allow a free market to separate the children of idiots from the children of responsible parents. Right there you hit the nail on the head...kinda. If parents had to pay for their kids education out of THEIR pocket, instead of their neighbors, damn sure they would pay attention to their kids learning and behavior. Ain't going to happen in tax funded schools. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Tom Sixkiller" wrote in message
... "Dude" wrote in message ... I figured you would want to throw parents who wouldn't pay for their kids education into jail. Looks like it was a bad guess. People would educate their kids that same way the feed them, cloth them, care for their health..the same way they do those things for them now. If they fail to do those things now, we call it...what? That depends. If the failure is because the costs far exceed the parents' income, we call it poverty and lend a hand, as we should. --Gary |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Tom Sixkiller wrote: "Dude" wrote in message ... I figured you would want to throw parents who wouldn't pay for their kids education into jail. Looks like it was a bad guess. People would educate their kids that same way the feed them, cloth them, care for their health..the same way they do those things for them now. If they fail to do those things now, we call it...what? There are LOTS of parents who don't feed, cloth and care for their children. At least these kids get 2 meals a day and a safe place to go for 6.5 hours a day. It's called PUBLIC SCHOOL. Margy "Tom Sixkiller" wrote in message ... "Dude" wrote in message ... Tom, Making the parents more involved by making them pay would be great, but I am not gonna hold my breath. Also, I am not sure that the end result would be a net improvement. Many parents are such numbskulls that the kids may end up getting even less education. I know what you are thinking, but there is not room in the jails for all the parents who fit this bill. Jail? How does that fit? So, I will agree with you in theory, but have to disagree in what is practical (at least until congress is taken over by libertarians). Until the majority of people change between their ears, nothing is going to change/improve _politically_. As long as the notion of public schools is predominnt, it will continue its course. "You can't change a country through the politcal process; you can only change people's point-of-view (ie, political views/outlook). OUT "Tom Sixkiller" wrote in message ... "Dude" wrote in message ... Teachers I have talked too care less about the money and more about the fact that they have ZERO control in the classroom. The students have a right to do whatever they please wthout recourse. Only the best leaders are capable of controlling a classroom through force of personality. Enough of those people might be recruited with lots more money, but maybe not. The quicker solution is to either bring back corporal punishment and expulsions, or go with vouchers that will allow a free market to separate the children of idiots from the children of responsible parents. Right there you hit the nail on the head...kinda. If parents had to pay for their kids education out of THEIR pocket, instead of their neighbors, damn sure they would pay attention to their kids learning and behavior. Ain't going to happen in tax funded schools. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dude" wrote in message ... I figured you would want to throw parents who wouldn't pay for their kids education into jail. Looks like it was a bad guess. People would educate their kids that same way the feed them, cloth them, care for their health..the same way they do those things for them now. If they fail to do those things now, we call it...what? "Tom Sixkiller" wrote in message ... "Dude" wrote in message ... Tom, Making the parents more involved by making them pay would be great, but I am not gonna hold my breath. Also, I am not sure that the end result would be a net improvement. Many parents are such numbskulls that the kids may end up getting even less education. I know what you are thinking, but there is not room in the jails for all the parents who fit this bill. Jail? How does that fit? So, I will agree with you in theory, but have to disagree in what is practical (at least until congress is taken over by libertarians). Until the majority of people change between their ears, nothing is going to change/improve _politically_. As long as the notion of public schools is predominnt, it will continue its course. "You can't change a country through the politcal process; you can only change people's point-of-view (ie, political views/outlook). OUT "Tom Sixkiller" wrote in message ... "Dude" wrote in message ... Teachers I have talked too care less about the money and more about the fact that they have ZERO control in the classroom. The students have a right to do whatever they please wthout recourse. Only the best leaders are capable of controlling a classroom through force of personality. Enough of those people might be recruited with lots more money, but maybe not. The quicker solution is to either bring back corporal punishment and expulsions, or go with vouchers that will allow a free market to separate the children of idiots from the children of responsible parents. Right there you hit the nail on the head...kinda. If parents had to pay for their kids education out of THEIR pocket, instead of their neighbors, damn sure they would pay attention to their kids learning and behavior. Ain't going to happen in tax funded schools. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Dude wrote: Teachers I have talked too care less about the money and more about the fact that they have ZERO control in the classroom. That's certainly true here. I know two people who left decent jobs in telecom industry to teach. One retired, and one left starry-eyed in mid-career. Both came back somewhat disillusioned. The one who retired to teach is reluctant to discuss the situation. The other one echoed what you've just said. Said the kids run wild and you can do nothing about it. George Patterson Great discoveries are not announced with "Eureka!". What's usually said is "Hummmmm... That's interesting...." |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
American nazi pond scum, version two | bushite kills bushite | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 21st 04 10:46 PM |
Hey! What fun!! Let's let them kill ourselves!!! | [email protected] | Naval Aviation | 2 | December 17th 04 09:45 PM |
15 Dec 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News | Otis Willie | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 15th 03 10:01 PM |
15 Dec 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | December 15th 03 10:01 PM |
08 Dec 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News | Otis Willie | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 8th 03 11:28 PM |