A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Home Built
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Flying wing vs tailless airplane



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old April 24th 04, 03:26 AM
Blueskies
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

The B2 fails the no fuselage definition I would think, blended fuselage maybe but not no fuselage.

--
Dan D.
http://www.ameritech.net/users/ddevillers/start.html


..
"Wright1902Glider" wrote in message ...
Actually, I think a lifting fuselage comes under its own category... lifting
body.
Historically, a flying wing aircraft is not only without a fuselage, it is just
a wing. Its engines, cockpit, bomb bays, landing gear, etc. are all contained
within the wing structure itself. That would include all of Northrop's designs
(YB-49, B-2), most/all of Horten's, and just about every hang-glider since
Francis Regallo. I would also clasify the ME-162 as a flying wing even though
it is a little fat in its center section.

I'd call the F-106, Mirage, space shuttle, Concorde, etc. delta-winged
aircraft. Definately a triangular-shaped wing attached to a fuselage.

Now here's another question: are canard aircraft tailless? I can think of
some that a Rutan EZ, Wright 1900 & 1901 gliders. I can also think of some
that aren't: Rutan Voyager, Wright 1902-1908 Flyers.

Fun stuff,
Harry



  #2  
Old April 24th 04, 07:40 AM
Dude
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Thus my predicament. How "blended" does it have to be to count as a part of
the wing?




"Blueskies" wrote in message
. com...
The B2 fails the no fuselage definition I would think, blended fuselage

maybe but not no fuselage.

--
Dan D.
http://www.ameritech.net/users/ddevillers/start.html


.
"Wright1902Glider" wrote in message

...
Actually, I think a lifting fuselage comes under its own category...

lifting
body.
Historically, a flying wing aircraft is not only without a fuselage, it

is just
a wing. Its engines, cockpit, bomb bays, landing gear, etc. are all

contained
within the wing structure itself. That would include all of Northrop's

designs
(YB-49, B-2), most/all of Horten's, and just about every hang-glider

since
Francis Regallo. I would also clasify the ME-162 as a flying wing even

though
it is a little fat in its center section.

I'd call the F-106, Mirage, space shuttle, Concorde, etc. delta-winged
aircraft. Definately a triangular-shaped wing attached to a fuselage.

Now here's another question: are canard aircraft tailless? I can think

of
some that a Rutan EZ, Wright 1900 & 1901 gliders. I can also think

of some
that aren't: Rutan Voyager, Wright 1902-1908 Flyers.

Fun stuff,
Harry





 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) Ron Wanttaja Home Built 0 April 5th 04 04:04 PM
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) Ron Wanttaja Home Built 2 February 3rd 04 12:41 AM
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) Ron Wanttaja Home Built 0 October 2nd 03 04:07 AM
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) Ron Wanttaja Home Built 4 August 7th 03 06:12 AM
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently-Asked Questions (FAQ) Ron Wanttaja Home Built 0 July 4th 03 05:50 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:16 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.