![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
The B2 fails the no fuselage definition I would think, blended fuselage maybe but not no fuselage.
-- Dan D. http://www.ameritech.net/users/ddevillers/start.html .. "Wright1902Glider" wrote in message ... Actually, I think a lifting fuselage comes under its own category... lifting body. Historically, a flying wing aircraft is not only without a fuselage, it is just a wing. Its engines, cockpit, bomb bays, landing gear, etc. are all contained within the wing structure itself. That would include all of Northrop's designs (YB-49, B-2), most/all of Horten's, and just about every hang-glider since Francis Regallo. I would also clasify the ME-162 as a flying wing even though it is a little fat in its center section. I'd call the F-106, Mirage, space shuttle, Concorde, etc. delta-winged aircraft. Definately a triangular-shaped wing attached to a fuselage. Now here's another question: are canard aircraft tailless? I can think of some that a Rutan EZ, Wright 1900 & 1901 gliders. I can also think of some that aren't: Rutan Voyager, Wright 1902-1908 Flyers. Fun stuff, Harry |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thus my predicament. How "blended" does it have to be to count as a part of
the wing? "Blueskies" wrote in message . com... The B2 fails the no fuselage definition I would think, blended fuselage maybe but not no fuselage. -- Dan D. http://www.ameritech.net/users/ddevillers/start.html . "Wright1902Glider" wrote in message ... Actually, I think a lifting fuselage comes under its own category... lifting body. Historically, a flying wing aircraft is not only without a fuselage, it is just a wing. Its engines, cockpit, bomb bays, landing gear, etc. are all contained within the wing structure itself. That would include all of Northrop's designs (YB-49, B-2), most/all of Horten's, and just about every hang-glider since Francis Regallo. I would also clasify the ME-162 as a flying wing even though it is a little fat in its center section. I'd call the F-106, Mirage, space shuttle, Concorde, etc. delta-winged aircraft. Definately a triangular-shaped wing attached to a fuselage. Now here's another question: are canard aircraft tailless? I can think of some that a Rutan EZ, Wright 1900 & 1901 gliders. I can also think of some that aren't: Rutan Voyager, Wright 1902-1908 Flyers. Fun stuff, Harry |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | April 5th 04 04:04 PM |
| Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 2 | February 3rd 04 12:41 AM |
| Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | October 2nd 03 04:07 AM |
| Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 4 | August 7th 03 06:12 AM |
| Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently-Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | July 4th 03 05:50 PM |