![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Unlikely "Soulseek" is illegal. There may be files on the
peer-to-peer network that appear to be in violation of copyright law, but that doesn't mean the service is illegal. Providing the means and method with which to break the law isn't illegal? By that logic, (and admittedly this is an extreme example) the guy who supplied the explosives to blow up the Federal Building in Oklahoma City should be released. All he did was provide the means, right? And Soulseek is providing these means on a truly grand scale. I'm no lawyer, but using the site sure "felt" illegal! -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Jay Honeck" wrote in message news:L8eSb.181253$xy6.869765@attbi_s02... Providing the means and method with which to break the law isn't illegal? In general not. Otherwise every gun store owner and manufactuer would already be locked up. Depending on the local laws, it may or may not be legal for me to carry locksmithing tools with me. In some cases it's only illegal for me to carry them if I intend to use them to break the law. In the case of communications, you've really got to provide a convincing case (or a lot of bribe money, er I mean, campaign donations) to place a restriction on it. By that logic, (and admittedly this is an extreme example) the guy who supplied the explosives to blow up the Federal Building in Oklahoma City should be released. All he did was provide the means, right? I'm not sure who you are talking about. If you're talking about Nichols, he did more than just provide explosives...he was found guilty of conspiracy. And Soulseek is providing these means on a truly grand scale. I'm no lawyer, but using the site sure "felt" illegal! Using it may be illegal, but that doesn't make the site owners liable. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Providing the means and method with which to break the law isn't
illegal? In general not. Otherwise every gun store owner and manufactuer would already be locked up. Depending on the local laws, it may or may not be legal for me to carry locksmithing tools with me. In some cases it's only illegal for me to carry them if I intend to use them to break the law. Good point. The law really does seem to be schizophrenic about this issue. Figuring out where someone becomes an "accessory" to a crime is a really, really fine line. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Jay Honeck" wrote in message news:aVeSb.51839$U%5.286277@attbi_s03... Good point. The law really does seem to be schizophrenic about this issue. Not much more than anything else. Figuring out where someone becomes an "accessory" to a crime is a really, really fine line. Generally, you need specific knowledge about the criminal act. Prior restraint on free speech is a hard thing to enforce even with a statute (or else these sites would be long gone). These sites will argue that they exist only to facilitate legal sharing of information. The fact that they could be used for illegal activity doesn't making them (by their argument) any more liable than Xerox is if someone sticks a $100 bill in the copier and starts running off copies. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Jay Honeck wrote: Providing the means and method with which to break the law isn't illegal? In general not. Otherwise every gun store owner and manufactuer would already be locked up. Depending on the local laws, it may or may not be legal for me to carry locksmithing tools with me. In some cases it's only illegal for me to carry them if I intend to use them to break the law. Good point. The law really does seem to be schizophrenic about this issue. Not at all. Anybody can make and sell anything that has a legal use. It is using the item to break the law that's illegal, and that includes conspiring to do so. Nothing schizoid about it. George Patterson Love, n.: A form of temporary insanity afflicting the young. It is curable either by marriage or by removal of the afflicted from the circumstances under which he incurred the condition. It is sometimes fatal, but more often to the physician than to the patient. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
"G.R. Patterson III" wrote in message ... Jay Honeck wrote: Providing the means and method with which to break the law isn't illegal? In general not. Otherwise every gun store owner and manufactuer would already be locked up. Depending on the local laws, it may or may not be legal for me to carry locksmithing tools with me. In some cases it's only illegal for me to carry them if I intend to use them to break the law. Good point. The law really does seem to be schizophrenic about this issue. Not at all. Anybody can make and sell anything that has a legal use. It is using the item to break the law that's illegal, and that includes conspiring to do so. Nothing schizoid about it. (Maybe I'm missing the context here) Really? Try building your own .45 Auto just to keep around the house or shoot at the range.. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
what about it? you live in cali where they're funny about that? cause ive
built several of my own guns including a .45, .308 FAL, AR-15 etc.(next will be a AK) but as long as you do it within the boundaries of state and federal laws its perfectly legal. -Nick (also a FFL holder) (Maybe I'm missing the context here) Really? Try building your own .45 Auto just to keep around the house or shoot at the range.. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
I doubt anyone you know built their own firearm. At least what the BATF
classifies as a firearm. In the case of the 1911 Style .45 it is the frame. In the case of the AR-15 it is the lower receiver. those are the parts with the serial number on them. I've assembled several guns but I've never manufactured one. The paperwork to do so would be ridicules. Gig Giacona www.peoamerica.net/N601WR "BigNick73" wrote in message .. . what about it? you live in cali where they're funny about that? cause ive built several of my own guns including a .45, .308 FAL, AR-15 etc.(next will be a AK) but as long as you do it within the boundaries of state and federal laws its perfectly legal. -Nick (also a FFL holder) (Maybe I'm missing the context here) Really? Try building your own .45 Auto just to keep around the house or shoot at the range.. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Routine Aviation Career | Guy Alcala | Military Aviation | 0 | September 26th 04 01:33 AM |
| Flying with music? | caroline | Aerobatics | 0 | September 18th 04 04:13 AM |
| World War II Flying 'Ace' Salutes Racial Progress, By Gerry J. Gilmore | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 2 | February 22nd 04 04:33 AM |
| Downloading Flying Music? | Jay Honeck | Home Built | 59 | February 4th 04 07:08 AM |
| PIREP: Grand Canyon Caverns (L37) | Tony Cox | Piloting | 4 | November 2nd 03 01:54 PM |