![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 01 Feb 2004 10:12:54 -0800, Jeff wrote:
Well the elections are comming up, if you think things are getting bad now, wait untill GW gets re-elected (if he does), then he has no reason to not hold back since he would be on his last term. Let's kick his dumb ass out! Might be nice to have a president that has at least half a brain and not a puppet. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Abafon Goula" wrote in message ... On Sun, 01 Feb 2004 10:12:54 -0800, Jeff wrote: Well the elections are comming up, if you think things are getting bad now, wait untill GW gets re-elected (if he does), then he has no reason to not hold back since he would be on his last term. Let's kick his dumb ass out! Might be nice to have a president that has at least half a brain and not a puppet. And which one from the past 150 years or more, would fit that description? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Abraham Lincoln and Theodore Roosevelt
Mike MU-2 "Tom Sixkiller" wrote in message ... "Abafon Goula" wrote in message ... On Sun, 01 Feb 2004 10:12:54 -0800, Jeff wrote: Well the elections are comming up, if you think things are getting bad now, wait untill GW gets re-elected (if he does), then he has no reason to not hold back since he would be on his last term. Let's kick his dumb ass out! Might be nice to have a president that has at least half a brain and not a puppet. And which one from the past 150 years or more, would fit that description? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mike Rapoport" wrote in message nk.net... Abraham Lincoln and Theodore Roosevelt You could not have named two that did more to let the "cat outta the bag". Well, no, they weren't puppets, but they sure liked to pull the strings. It's a quetion who money was worse, J. Davis' Confederate money, or Lincoln's "Greenbacks". Lincoln started us on the road to the overarching state, and Teddy gave us the start (and a goodly trip down the road) to the Military-Industrial Complex. Mike MU-2 "Tom Sixkiller" wrote in message ... "Abafon Goula" wrote in message ... On Sun, 01 Feb 2004 10:12:54 -0800, Jeff wrote: Well the elections are comming up, if you think things are getting bad now, wait untill GW gets re-elected (if he does), then he has no reason to not hold back since he would be on his last term. Let's kick his dumb ass out! Might be nice to have a president that has at least half a brain and not a puppet. And which one from the past 150 years or more, would fit that description? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Tom Sixkiller" wrote in message ... "Mike Rapoport" wrote in message nk.net... Abraham Lincoln and Theodore Roosevelt You could not have named two that did more to let the "cat outta the bag". Well, no, they weren't puppets, but they sure liked to pull the strings. It's a quetion who money was worse, J. Davis' Confederate money, or Lincoln's "Greenbacks". Lincoln started us on the road to the overarching state, and Teddy gave us the start (and a goodly trip down the road) to the Military-Industrial Complex. And a segregated military. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ... "Tom Sixkiller" wrote in message ... "Mike Rapoport" wrote in message nk.net... Abraham Lincoln and Theodore Roosevelt You could not have named two that did more to let the "cat outta the bag". Well, no, they weren't puppets, but they sure liked to pull the strings. It's a quetion who money was worse, J. Davis' Confederate money, or Lincoln's "Greenbacks". Lincoln started us on the road to the overarching state, and Teddy gave us the start (and a goodly trip down the road) to the Military-Industrial Complex. And a segregated military. The military was segregated long before Teddy's time. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Tom Sixkiller" wrote in message ... "Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ... "Tom Sixkiller" wrote in message ... "Mike Rapoport" wrote in message nk.net... Abraham Lincoln and Theodore Roosevelt You could not have named two that did more to let the "cat outta the bag". Well, no, they weren't puppets, but they sure liked to pull the strings. It's a quetion who money was worse, J. Davis' Confederate money, or Lincoln's "Greenbacks". Lincoln started us on the road to the overarching state, and Teddy gave us the start (and a goodly trip down the road) to the Military-Industrial Complex. And a segregated military. The military was segregated long before Teddy's time. Nope. A segregated military was TR's response to Blacks refusing to do a human wave attack on Spanish machine guns in Cuba. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Abafon Goula" wrote in message ... On Sun, 01 Feb 2004 10:12:54 -0800, Jeff wrote: Well the elections are comming up, if you think things are getting bad now, wait untill GW gets re-elected (if he does), then he has no reason to not hold back since he would be on his last term. Let's kick his dumb ass out! Might be nice to have a president that has at least half a brain and not a puppet. Unfortunately there will only be a few choices and Teddy Roosevelt is not running this year. A major problem is that the candidates in the election had to win the primaries. It is difficult to win the Democratic primary without being a big government, tax and spend, bleeding heart. It is difficult to win the Republican primary without being a big government, borrow and spend, friend of big polluting business and the religious right. Looks like, no matter who wins, we will have a big government with Santa Claus at its head. Of course the real Santa Clause brought presents to everybody and government Santa Clauses favor their constituencies. Basically each generation is trying to steal from the next. The retired try to steal from the working by demanding medical and retirement benefits vastly greater than any taxes that they paid to fund them. The working in turn try to steal from future generations by running a deficit in good times and bad. The future generations have had nobody since TR to advance their cause. Mike MU-2 |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Unfortunately there will only be a few choices and Teddy Roosevelt is not running this year. A major problem is that the candidates in the election had to win the primaries. It is difficult to win the Democratic primary without being a big government, tax and spend, bleeding heart. It is difficult to win the Republican primary without being a big government, borrow and spend, friend of big polluting business and the religious right. Looks like, no matter who wins, we will have a big government with Santa Claus at its head. Of course the real Santa Clause brought presents to everybody and government Santa Clauses favor their constituencies. Basically each generation is trying to steal from the next. The retired try to steal from the working by demanding medical and retirement benefits vastly greater than any taxes that they paid to fund them. The working in turn try to steal from future generations by running a deficit in good times and bad. The future generations have had nobody since TR to advance their cause. Mike MU-2 The concept of future generations being penalized as a result of a federal government deficit has always appeared a bit one-sided to me. Future generations get the benefits of costs incurred by previous generations - including tangible benefits in the form of roads built, national parks, functional government institutions created to help maintain a stable society, as well as considerable intangible benefits such as freedom and the benefits of wars won in the past (whose costs were undeniable and borne by previous generations). If future generations get the benefits of the hard work of previous generations (in the form of a better standard of living and more perfect society), should they not absorb at least part of the cost? It is beyond me how to equitably allocate the costs among generations (i.e. - determine what level of deficit a future generation should be required to assume), but it does seem fair that future generations should pay at least some of the cost of instititions and assets built for their benefit. John. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
That's fine, but how do future generations benefit from the ever increasing
welfare handouts? -- --Ray Andraka, P.E. President, the Andraka Consulting Group, Inc. 401/884-7930 Fax 401/884-7950 http://www.andraka.com "They that give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -Benjamin Franklin, 1759 |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
sold 310 -- now what? | Cary Mariash | Owning | 49 | January 9th 05 04:46 PM |
Donald Campbell Bluebird helmet sold | Aerophotos | Military Aviation | 1 | May 3rd 04 05:11 PM |
Japanese firm sold Libya uranium conversion plant | Dav1936531 | Military Aviation | 2 | March 17th 04 03:47 PM |
Sold out by IFR | Mike Rapoport | Owning | 126 | February 9th 04 10:47 PM |
SOLD Becker ATC-4401-175 and SigmaTek ARC EA-401A Servoed Encoding Alt | Juan E Jimenez | Home Built | 0 | August 11th 03 05:03 AM |