![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jay Honeck" wrote in message news:4i6Yb.197204$U%5.1028608@attbi_s03... Yes, of course. And those polls accurately reflected voter preferences at the time. Polls don't purport to show what the preferences will necessarily be in the future. Everyone understands that distinction, don't they? You truly believe that those polls were accurate? You've got more faith in pollsters than I do. Or, I suppose, one could conclude that the polls WERE accurate, and that those Democrats who supported Dean so strongly simply showed the loyalty of a bunch of alley cats? Huh? How do you infer the strength of any individual's support from the poll results? A bunch of people are asked to express whatever (perhaps very small) preference they may have at the moment, well before the actual vote. Is there some reason that such a preference should establish a debt of "loyalty" that overrides future deliberations or developments? --Gary Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Is there some reason that such a preference should establish a debt of
"loyalty" that overrides future deliberations or developments? How far in the "future" should we assume someone's loyalty? A month? A week? The polls showed Dean was favored by the majority of Democrats in Iowa -- right up till the last day. And they were totally wrong. Now that may have something to do with the caucus structure, which (IMHO) is completely bogus, but I think it also says something about polls. And, perhaps, Democrats. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jay Honeck" wrote in message
news:R37Yb.197505$U%5.1032695@attbi_s03... Is there some reason that such a preference should establish a debt of "loyalty" that overrides future deliberations or developments? How far in the "future" should we assume someone's loyalty? A month? A week? Until the flight strip is discarded. :-) (Sorry, that's a reference to another thread here--one that's actually on-topic. ![]() --Gary |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Swift Boat Guys Caught in Some Great Big Lies | WalterM140 | Military Aviation | 44 | August 23rd 04 08:30 PM |
General Zinni on Sixty Minutes | WalterM140 | Military Aviation | 428 | July 1st 04 11:16 PM |
Two MOH Winners say Bush Didn't Serve | WalterM140 | Military Aviation | 196 | June 14th 04 11:33 PM |
Something Fishy with Kerry's being a "Hero" | Pechs1 | Naval Aviation | 16 | February 29th 04 02:16 PM |
interesting thread today on rec.aviation.military | Chris Spierings | Military Aviation | 0 | November 12th 03 05:17 PM |