A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

This Week's NPR Weekend Edition Sunday Puzzle



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 26th 04, 04:09 PM
Teacherjh
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


What you do is whisper a random number to
person 1. He adds his weight to that number and whispers the result to person
2. He and person 3 dothe same. Person 3 tells the pilot the result of his
calculation. The pilot then subtracts the original random number and comes out
with the total of the passenger's weights.


This works as long as all passengers are good at math, and there are no
telephone errors.

The likelyhood of this is not something I want to contemplate.

Jose

--
(for Email, make the obvious changes in my address)
  #2  
Old February 26th 04, 05:08 PM
G.R. Patterson III
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Teacherjh wrote:


What you do is whisper a random number to
person 1. He adds his weight to that number and whispers the result to person
2. He and person 3 dothe same. Person 3 tells the pilot the result of his
calculation. The pilot then subtracts the original random number and comes out
with the total of the passenger's weights.


This works as long as all passengers are good at math, and there are no
telephone errors.


Ok, then punch some random number into your calculator and have each passenger
add in his/her weight on that.

George Patterson
A diplomat is a person who can tell you to go to hell in such a way that
you look forward to the trip.
  #3  
Old February 26th 04, 05:31 PM
Teacherjh
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Ok, then punch some random number into your calculator and have each passenger
add in his/her weight on that.


....and do it two or three times with different numbers to assure yourself that
nobody ELSE made errors. I've watched too many people do math and science,
with and without calculators, to trust such results. In calculating the speed
of a baseball (starting with reasonable assumptions) I've seen a lot of
students put down "0.024121331 mph" because that's what the calculator said.

If there's a W&B to be done, it will be ME that does it. I mever nake
mistakes.

Jose

--
(for Email, make the obvious changes in my address)
  #4  
Old February 26th 04, 05:45 PM
Peter Duniho
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Teacherjh" wrote in message
...
If there's a W&B to be done, it will be ME that does it. I mever nake
mistakes.


Ne either. Oh, I think I found your "n". Want to trade?

The funny thing about this whole problem is that it ignores the fact that
you need not the combined weights for all three passengers, but the combined
weights of two of them (sitting in the rear seat) and the weight of the
front passenger (added to your own, of course).

It's a nice "brain teaser", but it has no practical application, at least
not with the solutions given so far.

One theoretically accurate solution would be to load up the airplane, then
measure the area of the contact patches of each tire. By dividing the area
by the tire pressure (making sure the units match, of course...for example,
measuring area in square inches, and pressure in psi), you get the
distribution of the weight at each tire, which gives you not only total
aircraft weight, but also enough information to calculate a moment, to which
you can include your own weight and position (since I'm assuming the pilot
is not in the plane, but rather is the one taking measurements), and
determine the exact location of the CG.

Of course, there's no really practical way to measure the area of the
contact patch, what with it not being exactly rectangular, there being voids
where the tread has gaps, and the like. But unlike the "add 'em all up"
solution, at least this one has the potential to actually give useful
information, if only the impracticalities could be addressed.

Pete


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Weekend IFR ground school with Aviation Seminars Brad Z Instrument Flight Rules 1 September 20th 04 03:05 PM
19 Sep 2004 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News Otis Willie Naval Aviation 0 September 19th 04 11:54 PM
USS Liberty Challenge/Reward Issac Goldberg Naval Aviation 75 July 16th 04 09:28 PM
The War's Lost Weekend WalterM140 Military Aviation 32 May 18th 04 07:42 AM
FS: Aviation History Books Neil Cournoyer Military Aviation 0 August 26th 03 08:32 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:41 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.