A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

units of measurement on altimeters



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 7th 04, 04:25 PM
Gene Nygaard
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sun, 7 Mar 2004 16:18:10 +0000 (UTC), "Jukka K. Korpela"
wrote:

(Pat Norton) wrote:

Do all commercial aircraft that fly in and out of North America have
dual unit altimeters (hPa and inHg)?


I don't know about that, but as regards to the metric system, I would
like to mention that using hPa is _not_ the recommended way. Although
the "h" prefix is formally part of the SI system, it's regarded as
unsuitable by many, including NIST.

In practice, using hPa means being just _nominally_ metric, i.e. using
actually millibars but under a different name. The odd thing is that
the correct kPa would be more practical.


Amen.
http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homep...d/hectopas.htm

This screwball unit is just a misguided effort to hang onto an
obsolete unit by cloaking it in a marginally SI name. It makes no
more sense than soils scientists measuring soil conductivity (or
whatever is the proper term for the quantity measured, I'm doing this
off the top of my head without checking the terminology used) in units
of "dS/m".

Can you figure out the ever-so-handy unit the soils scientists are so
desperately trying to salvage?

Gene Nygaard
http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/Gene_Nygaard/
  #2  
Old March 7th 04, 08:42 PM
S Green
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Gene Nygaard" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 7 Mar 2004 16:18:10 +0000 (UTC), "Jukka K. Korpela"
wrote:

(Pat Norton) wrote:

Do all commercial aircraft that fly in and out of North America have
dual unit altimeters (hPa and inHg)?


I don't know about that, but as regards to the metric system, I would
like to mention that using hPa is _not_ the recommended way. Although
the "h" prefix is formally part of the SI system, it's regarded as
unsuitable by many, including NIST.

In practice, using hPa means being just _nominally_ metric, i.e. using
actually millibars but under a different name. The odd thing is that
the correct kPa would be more practical.


Amen.



What about the pieze = 1000 pascals?


  #3  
Old March 7th 04, 08:53 PM
Gene Nygaard
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sun, 7 Mar 2004 20:42:10 -0000, "S Green"
wrote:


"Gene Nygaard" wrote in message
.. .
On Sun, 7 Mar 2004 16:18:10 +0000 (UTC), "Jukka K. Korpela"
wrote:

(Pat Norton) wrote:

Do all commercial aircraft that fly in and out of North America have
dual unit altimeters (hPa and inHg)?

I don't know about that, but as regards to the metric system, I would
like to mention that using hPa is _not_ the recommended way. Although
the "h" prefix is formally part of the SI system, it's regarded as
unsuitable by many, including NIST.

In practice, using hPa means being just _nominally_ metric, i.e. using
actually millibars but under a different name. The odd thing is that
the correct kPa would be more practical.


Amen.



What about the pieze = 1000 pascals?


The International System of Units is a meter-kilogram-second system of
units.

That mts unit of pressure is no more SI than the cgs unit of pressure,
the barye equal to 0.1 Pa.

Note that bars are so obsolete that they never did fit into any of the
many different coherent systems of units--not only do they not fit in
SI or any other coherent meter-kilogram-second system, but they did
not fit in centimeter-gram-second systems and they did not fit in
meter-ton-second systems.

Gene Nygaard
http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/Gene_Nygaard/
  #4  
Old March 8th 04, 05:27 PM
Markus Kuhn
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"S Green" writes:
What about the pieze = 1000 pascals?


http://www.unc.edu/~rowlett/units/dictP.html

pieze (pz)

a metric unit of pressure, part of the "metre-tonne-second" system
sometimes used by European engineers. The pieze is a pressure of
one sthene per square meter, or 1000 newtons per square meter,
or one kilopascal. [...]
The name of the unit comes from the Greek piezein, to press.
The unit, spelled pièze in French, is pronounced "pee-ezz" in English.

Interesting. I had never heard of a metre-tonne-second system
before. Where was it invented and in which fields was it used?

Markus

  #5  
Old March 8th 04, 06:27 PM
S Green
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Markus Kuhn" wrote in message
...
"S Green" writes:
What about the pieze = 1000 pascals?


http://www.unc.edu/~rowlett/units/dictP.html

pieze (pz)

a metric unit of pressure, part of the "metre-tonne-second" system
sometimes used by European engineers. The pieze is a pressure of
one sthene per square meter, or 1000 newtons per square meter,
or one kilopascal. [...]
The name of the unit comes from the Greek piezein, to press.
The unit, spelled pièze in French, is pronounced "pee-ezz" in English.

Interesting. I had never heard of a metre-tonne-second system
before. Where was it invented and in which fields was it used?

Markus


Well as I said our aircraft has the manifold pressure in pieze

ie 27 inches = 90 pieze approx


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Showstoppers (long, but interesting questions raised) Anonymous Spamless Military Aviation 0 April 21st 04 05:09 AM
GWB and the Air Guard JD Military Aviation 77 March 17th 04 10:52 AM
Crosswind components James L. Freeman Piloting 25 February 29th 04 01:21 AM
RV-7a baggage area David Smith Home Built 32 December 15th 03 04:08 AM
A-4 / A-7 Question Tank Fixer Military Aviation 135 October 25th 03 03:59 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.