A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Northwest CEO Richard Anderson Jabs General Aviation



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 14th 04, 08:44 PM
Eric Rood
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Larry Dighera wrote:I haven't noticed any airline consumers paying the
tax on GA fuel nor

GA landing fees.


Airlines usually pay a landing fee based on aircraft weight. ie.... $$$$
per 1000 pounds gross weight.
Here in Columbus OH is something like $1.25/1000 lbs.

  #2  
Old March 15th 04, 01:39 AM
Orval Fairbairn
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , Eric Rood
wrote:

Larry Dighera wrote:I haven't noticed any airline consumers paying the
tax on GA fuel nor

GA landing fees.


Airlines usually pay a landing fee based on aircraft weight. ie.... $$$$
per 1000 pounds gross weight.
Here in Columbus OH is something like $1.25/1000 lbs.


Of course, GA doesn't need 10000 feet of concrete 12 feet thick, nor
fancy terminals with elaborate security, nor baggage handling machines
nor Class B/C air traffic control measures, either.

All we need are runways paved to highway specs and 3000 - 5000 feeet
long, plus simple facilities containing an FBO office and a flight
planning room with DUATS and Weather Channel.
  #3  
Old March 16th 04, 09:11 PM
Brian Cox
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I don't think you have to peel too many layers from the Part 121 onion
to see areas where the airlines benefit from GA, or from other
sectors. The pilot candidates that funnel into the airlines are
either trained by the U.S. Government (Army, Navy, Air Force, Marines,
Coast Guard), or come up through the GA ranks through great personal
sacrifice.

Many of the towered airports in this country, including my home field
(BJC), depend on a large number of general aviation takeoffs and
landings to qualify for a tower and staff - the purely commercial
traffic won't provide enough activity to justify the facility.

It is unfortunate when an aviation industry veteran takes such a
libertarian view. He chooses to take pot shots at GA for his
perception that it is subsidized by another segment of the industry,
while conveniently ignoring any areas where the air transport industry
derives benefit. Any view that does not recognize that GA contributes
to the overall well being of Air Transport, and to the country's
general economy, is surely misguided.

How unfortunate.

Brian Cox
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Boeing Boondoggle Larry Dighera Military Aviation 77 September 15th 04 02:39 AM
NWA CEO Richard Anderson says GA not paying it's fair share Bela P. Havasreti Owning 4 March 16th 04 04:27 PM
MSNBC Reporting on GA Security Threat Scott Schluer Piloting 44 November 23rd 03 02:50 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:40 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.