![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Magnus wrote: Just curious how you guys perform this maneuver. From what I've been taught you should flare with a little power still in to soften the touchdown, and then keep rolling to avoid digging yourself into the runway surface. I just think that it should be possible to land anyway, without any power like you normally land. Just keep the plane airborne as long as possible and keep the nosewheel up as long as you can. Keeping power in just eats up a lot of runway it seems. I mean, how often do you happen to find a rough and long field. In the real world all the time. I land on dirt runways that are anywhere from 1000 feet long to 5000 feet long in my 182. Your landing technique depends on what the actual conditions are when you land. Ususally if a soft-field landing is required, it's a pretty short field too out in the bush somewhere. No, not really. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
In the real world all the time. I land on dirt runways that are
anywhere from 1000 feet long to 5000 feet long in my 182. Your landing technique depends on what the actual conditions are when you land. How soft can you go? I'm looking at purchasing (or homebuilding) something to operate from my farm. I have 1000 feet avavialbe that I can clean up the rest of the rocks and clear the trees at the end, but it was cultivated for many years before I purchased it. The soil is rich red clay based loam that turns to "swallow the car muck" when it gets a good rain, but with a grass cover and light rain it is just a little slippery..... There is a guideline for home strips from Aussie Gov. that recommends a light truck leaving about an inch of depression in the surface being a cut-off for flying onto, but maybe I should just invest in a good set of skis or floats for when it gets heavy? ;) Peter |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Bushy wrote: In the real world all the time. I land on dirt runways that are anywhere from 1000 feet long to 5000 feet long in my 182. Your landing technique depends on what the actual conditions are when you land. How soft can you go? I generally avoid muddy soft, too much work cleaning up the plane. Plus you never know whats really under the mud. I don't hesitate to land on grass, dirt, gravel, dry river beds, shorlines, etc. I'm looking at purchasing (or homebuilding) something to operate from my farm. I have 1000 feet avavialbe that I can clean up the rest of the rocks and clear the trees at the end, but it was cultivated for many years before I purchased it. The soil is rich red clay based loam that turns to "swallow the car muck" when it gets a good rain, but with a grass cover and light rain it is just a little slippery..... With 1000 feet total you're in Cub territory. In really wet conditions you may be grounded for a day ot two. There is a guideline for home strips from Aussie Gov. that recommends a light truck leaving about an inch of depression in the surface being a cut-off for flying onto, but maybe I should just invest in a good set of skis or floats for when it gets heavy? ;) Get a roller and compact the earth with a nice crown in the middle for drainage. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Use the biggest tires (tyres) available for your aircraft
Bushy wrote: In the real world all the time. I land on dirt runways that are anywhere from 1000 feet long to 5000 feet long in my 182. Your landing technique depends on what the actual conditions are when you land. How soft can you go? I'm looking at purchasing (or homebuilding) something to operate from my farm. I have 1000 feet avavialbe that I can clean up the rest of the rocks and clear the trees at the end, but it was cultivated for many years before I purchased it. The soil is rich red clay based loam that turns to "swallow the car muck" when it gets a good rain, but with a grass cover and light rain it is just a little slippery..... There is a guideline for home strips from Aussie Gov. that recommends a light truck leaving about an inch of depression in the surface being a cut-off for flying onto, but maybe I should just invest in a good set of skis or floats for when it gets heavy? ;) Peter |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Gliders typically land on turf strips. Talk with the operators and look at
their tire sizes, etc. There are FAA documents that spec out requirements for an "official" landing strip. One caution: gopher holes. They are hard to see while landing and can give the plane a nasty bump. "jsmith" wrote in message ... Use the biggest tires (tyres) available for your aircraft Bushy wrote: In the real world all the time. I land on dirt runways that are anywhere from 1000 feet long to 5000 feet long in my 182. Your landing technique depends on what the actual conditions are when you land. How soft can you go? I'm looking at purchasing (or homebuilding) something to operate from my farm. I have 1000 feet avavialbe that I can clean up the rest of the rocks and clear the trees at the end, but it was cultivated for many years before I purchased it. The soil is rich red clay based loam that turns to "swallow the car muck" when it gets a good rain, but with a grass cover and light rain it is just a little slippery..... There is a guideline for home strips from Aussie Gov. that recommends a light truck leaving about an inch of depression in the surface being a cut-off for flying onto, but maybe I should just invest in a good set of skis or floats for when it gets heavy? ;) Peter |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
"William W. Plummer" wrote in message
news:hQB8c.6087$JO3.12218@attbi_s04... Gliders typically land on turf strips. Talk with the operators and look at their tire sizes, etc. There are FAA documents that spec out requirements for an "official" landing strip. One caution: gopher holes. They are hard to see while landing and can give the plane a nasty bump. Actually I've found glider tires and undercarriages to be marginal in tough turf situations. They are typically lighter but only sit on one main tire. Concentrates the weight but it does allow you to more easily miss soft spots. A high performance glider at full gross with water in the wings is real marginal on soft turf - worse than your typical land plane. Any glider with retracts has minimally sized tires (and typically lousy brakes). And in the end, if you land but get stuck, you can disassemble. Looking at gliders makes logical sense but I think you'll find them optimized for things other than soft field ops. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| "bush flying" in the suburbs? | [email protected] | Home Built | 85 | December 29th 04 12:04 AM |
| Judge halts work on Navy landing field in eastern N.C. | Otis Willie | Naval Aviation | 1 | April 21st 04 01:04 PM |
| Now THIS is a short field landing | John Harlow | Piloting | 8 | March 16th 04 11:42 PM |
| "I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons | Curtl33 | General Aviation | 7 | January 10th 04 12:35 AM |
| Off topic - Landing of a B-17 | Ghost | Home Built | 2 | October 28th 03 05:35 PM |