A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Headsets: "Minimum Advertised Price"



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old April 4th 04, 03:39 AM
Peter
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Will Thompson wrote:

Just about all of the major (USA) pilot shops on the web use a "minimum
advertised price" for headsets. ...
So why is this? Manufacturers *cannot* set actual selling prices, per
federal law (Sherman Act and related) so it is strange that they try to
impose this barrier. .

At any rate it is just a hassle for the consumer becaues it
intentionally makes it difficult to find the best price. You would think
the manufacturer wouldn't mind the end seller selling for the best
possible price to get more sales. UNLESS of course the manufacturer
secretly sells to different dealers at different prices.....

I've done a lot of business on the web, and it is both weird and
annoying that aviation .headsets operate differently than everything
else.


It's certainly not restricted to aviation headsets. For one example this
is very common for GPS receivers. Look at the prices at www.tvnav.com -
for many of the Garmin receivers it says to click to send email for
price. Clicking actually opens your email with the price already listed.

As to the rationale, I believe it is to help the small volume retailers
who cannot compete on price with many of the mail and internet ordering
sites or even with the bigger brick-and-mortar retailers. If the prices
were widely advertised it would become even more apparent how much more
the small stores are frequently charging. But the small stores are often
the ones where customers get a chance to see and play with the products.
And probably many of the customers who try on a headset or check out a
GPS at a small retailer end up buying from one of the cheaper mailorder
or internet shops.
If Garmin (or Lightspeed, etc.) didn't help out the smaller dealers
with a MAP policy, many would stop carrying these products and it would
hurt the overall sales of the products since they wouldn't be as accessible
to potential customers who want to 'try before they buy'.

  #2  
Old April 4th 04, 03:00 PM
C J Campbell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Peter" wrote in message
newszKbc.181002$po.990627@attbi_s52...

It's certainly not restricted to aviation headsets. For one example this
is very common for GPS receivers. Look at the prices at www.tvnav.com -
for many of the Garmin receivers it says to click to send email for
price. Clicking actually opens your email with the price already listed.


Actually, Garmin sent a threatening letter to all their retailers saying
that they would cut off shipments of the new GPSMAP 296 for six months to
any retailer that they determined had sold (not just advertised) one of
these units for less than $1,695. The letter also said that it was necessary
to protect the reputation of Garmin. Apparently tvnav.com has retaliated by
refusing to stock the 296. I wouldn't be surprised if some of the other mass
marketers did the same. I suppose the smaller retailers would appreciate the
price protection if Garmin actually shipped them some units that they could
sell.


  #3  
Old April 5th 04, 12:59 AM
Will Thompson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



C J Campbell wrote:

"Peter" wrote in message
newszKbc.181002$po.990627@attbi_s52...

It's certainly not restricted to aviation headsets. For one example this
is very common for GPS receivers. Look at the prices at www.tvnav.com -
for many of the Garmin receivers it says to click to send email for
price. Clicking actually opens your email with the price already listed.


Actually, Garmin sent a threatening letter to all their retailers saying
that they would cut off shipments of the new GPSMAP 296 for six months to
any retailer that they determined had sold (not just advertised) one of
these units for less than $1,695. The letter also said that it was necessary
to protect the reputation of Garmin. Apparently tvnav.com has retaliated by
refusing to stock the 296. I wouldn't be surprised if some of the other mass
marketers did the same. I suppose the smaller retailers would appreciate the
price protection if Garmin actually shipped them some units that they could
sell.


That looks like a pretty flagrant violation of anti-trust laws and the Sherman
Act. A manufacturer cannot dictate what price an independent seller sells
something for. I'm sure that this happens quite often (Saturn cars? Perfumes?)
but I could see their letter later being known as "Exhibit A" if somebody
starting asking Garmin questions.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Floridians Are Hit With Price Gouging X98 Military Aviation 0 August 18th 04 04:07 PM
Garmin Price Fixing Post from other newsgroup TripodBill Home Built 17 August 4th 04 10:42 AM
Garmin Price Fixing Post from other newsgroup TripodBill Owning 15 July 20th 04 03:24 AM
Garmin Price Fixing Post from other newsgroup TripodBill Instrument Flight Rules 8 July 16th 04 04:50 PM
Garmin Price Fixing Post from other newsgroup TripodBill Aviation Marketplace 5 July 16th 04 02:36 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:14 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.