![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sorry... Forgot to mention the concept of cancelling in
the air once airport is in sight... NY likes it much better that way... John Price CFII/AGI/IGI http://home.att.net/~jm.price "Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message ink.net... "john price" wrote in message ... The fact that VFR minimums in class G are 1 mile and clear of clouds is not to encourage VFR pilots to go fly in that, but to make it legal for instrument pilots to complete approaches where the visibility minimums are 1 mile in the class G airspace... VFR minimums have nothing to do with IFR approaches. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "john price" wrote in message ... Sorry... Forgot to mention the concept of cancelling in the air once airport is in sight... NY likes it much better that way... Be careful there... if controlled airspace exists below 1200 feet and you break out of the clouds at 1000 feet with the runway in sight so you cancel IFR, you have just broken the minimum cloud separation requirement for VFR flight. -- Richard Kaplan, CFII www.flyimc.com |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"john price" wrote in message
... Sorry... Forgot to mention the concept of cancelling in the air once airport is in sight... NY likes it much better that way... This obviously helps if your cancelling lets the following aircraft carry on with the approach. It also helps if you are the following aircraft, and the pilot in front is on the ground or in sight, without having canceled. If you do that, would it be helpful to let ATC know you're continuing the (now, practice) approach under VFR? -- David Brooks |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm talking about real approaches... With real weather...
John Price CFII/AGI/IGI http://home.att.net/~jm.price "David Brooks" wrote in message ... "john price" wrote in message ... Sorry... Forgot to mention the concept of cancelling in the air once airport is in sight... NY likes it much better that way... This obviously helps if your cancelling lets the following aircraft carry on with the approach. It also helps if you are the following aircraft, and the pilot in front is on the ground or in sight, without having canceled. If you do that, would it be helpful to let ATC know you're continuing the (now, practice) approach under VFR? -- David Brooks |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "David Brooks" wrote in message ... This obviously helps if your cancelling lets the following aircraft carry on with the approach. It also helps if you are the following aircraft, and the pilot in front is on the ground or in sight, without having canceled. If you do that, would it be helpful to let ATC know you're continuing the (now, practice) approach under VFR? No. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Ice meteors, climate, sceptics | Brian Sandle | General Aviation | 43 | February 24th 04 12:27 AM |