A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Using the magenta circles



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old April 6th 04, 02:37 AM
john price
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Sorry... Forgot to mention the concept of cancelling in
the air once airport is in sight... NY likes it much better
that way...

John Price
CFII/AGI/IGI
http://home.att.net/~jm.price


"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message
ink.net...

"john price" wrote in message
...

The fact that VFR minimums in class G are 1 mile and
clear of clouds is not to encourage VFR pilots to go fly
in that, but to make it legal for instrument pilots to complete
approaches where the visibility minimums are 1 mile in the
class G airspace...


VFR minimums have nothing to do with IFR approaches.




  #2  
Old April 6th 04, 01:28 PM
Richard Kaplan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"john price" wrote in message
...

Sorry... Forgot to mention the concept of cancelling in
the air once airport is in sight... NY likes it much better
that way...


Be careful there... if controlled airspace exists below 1200 feet and you
break out of the clouds at 1000 feet with the runway in sight so you cancel
IFR, you have just broken the minimum cloud separation requirement for VFR
flight.

--
Richard Kaplan, CFII

www.flyimc.com


  #3  
Old April 7th 04, 01:02 AM
David Brooks
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"john price" wrote in message
...
Sorry... Forgot to mention the concept of cancelling in
the air once airport is in sight... NY likes it much better
that way...


This obviously helps if your cancelling lets the following aircraft carry on
with the approach. It also helps if you are the following aircraft, and the
pilot in front is on the ground or in sight, without having canceled.

If you do that, would it be helpful to let ATC know you're continuing the
(now, practice) approach under VFR?

-- David Brooks


  #4  
Old April 8th 04, 11:56 AM
john price
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I'm talking about real approaches... With real weather...

John Price
CFII/AGI/IGI
http://home.att.net/~jm.price


"David Brooks" wrote in message
...
"john price" wrote in message
...
Sorry... Forgot to mention the concept of cancelling in
the air once airport is in sight... NY likes it much better
that way...


This obviously helps if your cancelling lets the following aircraft carry

on
with the approach. It also helps if you are the following aircraft, and

the
pilot in front is on the ground or in sight, without having canceled.

If you do that, would it be helpful to let ATC know you're continuing the
(now, practice) approach under VFR?

-- David Brooks




  #5  
Old April 8th 04, 12:28 PM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"David Brooks" wrote in message
...

This obviously helps if your cancelling lets the following aircraft
carry on with the approach. It also helps if you are the following
aircraft, and the pilot in front is on the ground or in sight, without
having canceled.

If you do that, would it be helpful to let ATC know you're continuing
the (now, practice) approach under VFR?


No.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ice meteors, climate, sceptics Brian Sandle General Aviation 43 February 24th 04 12:27 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.