![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I was reading a "debate" in another NG about the ANG "yanking" President Bush's pilots certification. Most of this discussion is carried on by folks who don't know what they're talking about. In this case, "yanking" isn't what happened. Bush did not take his flight physical in 1972 (presumably because he wasn't in Texas but in Alabama), so he was grounded. Interestingly, his last physical in 1973 showed him as "crew member on flight status," so he presumably was either flying again or eligible to do so, hence: no longer grounded. I've looked into this hoo-hah with great diligence, and I have found nothing to suggest that Bush flew an airplane after May 15, 1972, when he cleared Ellington. Both his Texas unit and the one to which he transferred in Alabama were phasing out the F-102A in 1972. He evidently did not qualify in the replacement aircraft, the F-101B in the case of Ellington. http://www.warbirdforum.com/bushf102.htm all the best -- Dan Ford email: (put Cubdriver in subject line) The Warbird's Forum www.warbirdforum.com The Piper Cub Forum www.pipercubforum.com Viva Bush! blog www.vivabush.org |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In a previous article, said:
Interestingly, his last physical in 1973 showed him as "crew member on flight status," so he presumably was either flying again or eligible to do so, hence: no longer grounded. Would a pilot in a single person fighter be listed as "crew member"? That's wierd. -- Paul Tomblin http://xcski.com/blogs/pt/ Their constitution is unwritten, and is mostly based on common law and practice. In other words, they do something wrong and it then becomes the norm. -- Laurie Couturier, on the British legal system |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Paul Tomblin wrote: Would a pilot in a single person fighter be listed as "crew member"? That's wierd. No, that's normal. If the required crew is one person, then the pilot is the only crew member. This is standard terminology in insurance, aviation, military, and government (at least). George Patterson If you don't tell lies, you never have to remember what you said. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 24 Apr 2004 22:44:30 +0000 (UTC),
(Paul Tomblin) wrote: Would a pilot in a single person fighter be listed as "crew member"? I was told it was Air Force talk for qualified to fly (in any capacity, perhaps). all the best -- Dan Ford email: (put Cubdriver in subject line) The Warbird's Forum www.warbirdforum.com The Piper Cub Forum www.pipercubforum.com Viva Bush! blog www.vivabush.org |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Definitive Bush in the Guard -- AWOL | WalterM140 | Military Aviation | 5 | September 20th 04 10:42 PM |
Is Chris Thomas a Real Pilot? | jls | Home Built | 147 | September 14th 04 03:03 PM |
"W" is JFK's son and Bush revenge killed Kennedy in 1963 | Ross C. Bubba Nicholson | Owning | 1 | September 12th 04 12:33 AM |
"W" is JFK's son and Bush revenge killed Kennedy in 1963 | Ross C. Bubba Nicholson | Naval Aviation | 0 | August 28th 04 11:31 AM |