![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A MP gauge is nothing but an absolute pressure gauge. If you
disconnected it from the induction manifold and took it aloft, it would read the same as a manometer; absolute air pressure decreases with increasing altitude. When connected to the induction, all it shows is the air pressure on the downstream side of the throttle plate; it is NOT a direct measure of engine power! The tables are just attempting to explain how ****ty a MP is at measuring engine power... MikeM Skylane '1MM Journeyman wrote: So, I'm going through the performance charts for my new ride (in case anyone missed my long postings), and there's a graph that lists fuel flow for a given power setting (eg. 9.16 GPH @ 65%). Another charts lists MP at altitude for each power setting. The weird thing is the MP drops with altitude. ISTM, at constant power, MP should increase to compensate for reduced air density. I.e. at a given fuel flow, which translate to a given power, you need a bigger volume of air to maintain the proper mixture. We're talking small changes in MP, few 1/10th of inches per 1000', but they're definitely decreasing with altitude. Am I wrong or are the tables bogus? Morris (so why didn't Jim Fisher comment on my transition to low wings?) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , MikeM wrote:
A MP gauge is nothing but an absolute pressure gauge. If you disconnected it from the induction manifold and took it aloft, it would read the same as a manometer; absolute air pressure decreases with increasing altitude. Right. And when you turn the engine off on the ground, it reads current atmospheric pressure. When connected to the induction, all it shows is the air pressure on the downstream side of the throttle plate; it is NOT a direct Yeah. I forgot the ideal gas law for a moment. I should've thought it through better before posting the question. measure of engine power! The tables are just attempting to explain how ****ty a MP is at measuring engine power... It may not be linear but it is monotonic. Increase the MP (at a fixed RPM) and you get increased power. Morris |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Journeyman wrote:
It may not be linear but it is monotonic. Increase the MP (at a fixed RPM) and you get increased power. Very indirectly! Change the angle of the throttle plate, thereby causing more or less air pressure drop across the restriction, thereby causing the MP gauge to see a different absolute pressure. Change the rpm, and the volume of air flow past the throttle plate changes, thereby causing the MP gauge to see a different absolute pressure. Take the airplane to a higher altitude, thereby causing the MP gauge to see a different absolute pressure. Let the air induction filter get dirty, causing a flow restriction, thereby causing the MP gauge to see a different absolute pressure. Let the temperature/humidity change, thereby causing a change in air density, thereby causing the MP gauge to see a different absolute pressure. What you really want is a Mass Flow sensor. Every modern automobile has one, but our 1930's technology aircraft dont... MikeM |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
eScrew zen story | [email protected] | Owning | 0 | December 20th 04 07:19 AM |
Funny story about naval | [email protected] | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 20th 04 03:37 AM |
Power settings for 182RG | Andrew Gideon | Piloting | 19 | March 3rd 04 07:41 PM |
New Piper Aircraft Designations | EDR | Piloting | 8 | October 27th 03 01:18 PM |
#1 Jet of World War II | Christopher | Military Aviation | 203 | September 1st 03 03:04 AM |