![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"G.R. Patterson III" wrote: According to the Pilot Training Manual, the gear activation switch is located between the recognition light switches and the landing light switches. It is not particularly close to the flap switch. The flap switch is isolated, is not part of a row of switches (as is the gear switch), and it has side guards to make it easy to differentiate between it and other controls. Personally, I think the LG switch should be the one that's isolated and guarded, but .... Both the gear and flap switches are toggle switches, they are within a couple inches of each other on the center console. On the B-17 I flew the gear switch had a cover that had to be lifted to activate the rectraction. Even so our procedure was for the NFP to touch the flap switch and say "Confirm flaps?"..the FP then would check to be sure the flap switch was selected and reply "Flaps confirmed"...then and only then would the flaps be retracted. I doubt it. I think an electrical problem is much more likely on a 60 year old plane. The gear on the -17 are electrical. Each gear has it's own motor...nothing ties the left side to the right side. The only common item is the gear switch. The only failure I can think of that would cause the gear to retract would be a failure in the switch that closed the switch. The most likely failure would be human. -- Dale L. Falk There is nothing - absolutely nothing - half so much worth doing as simply messing around with airplanes. http://home.gci.net/~sncdfalk/flying.html |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Peter R." wrote in message As someone who has just started flying a retractable gear aircraft, I admit that I thought that, too, since grabbing the correct handle is always on my mind. But, since my speculation tends to be incorrect, I quickly thought of something else. ![]() I strongly doubt that's what happened, but the LG switch on a B-17 leaves room for that possibility. Used to volunteer with the bird that's at Evergreen in McMinnville now and out at the hangar we'd turn on the master switch to open the bomb bay when veterans were coming through, and the chief mechanic warned us repeatedly not to hit the landing gear switch because it was live. -c |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
James Robinson wrote:
The B-17 bomber owned by the Experimental Aircraft Assn. was damaged yesterday at Van Nuys airport when its main gear collaped. Discovery Wings has just had a feature about "Aluminum Overcast"'s restoration :-( :-( Dima |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I watched the crash video frame-by-frame. The right main wheel appeared to
separate from the gear 1/10 second before the right main gear collapsed. Then the left main gear collapsed, a few tenths after the right main. Looks to me as if the right gear wheel axle may have failed. G.R. Patterson III wrote: Pat wrote: James Robinson wrote in message ... The B-17 bomber owned by the Experimental Aircraft Assn. was damaged yesterday at Van Nuys airport when its main gear collaped. Am I the only one who finds it a bit "suspicious" that both main gear collapsed on this bird? If I recall correctly, they are two independant systems. The common link would be in the cockpit... right next to the flaps switch. According to the Pilot Training Manual, the gear activation switch is located between the recognition light switches and the landing light switches. It is not particularly close to the flap switch. The flap switch is isolated, is not part of a row of switches (as is the gear switch), and it has side guards to make it easy to differentiate between it and other controls. Personally, I think the LG switch should be the one that's isolated and guarded, but .... Anyone else think that perhaps the gear were inadvertantly retracted (pilot attempting to retract flaps) rather than a mechanical failure...??? I doubt it. I think an electrical problem is much more likely on a 60 year old plane. George Patterson If you don't tell lies, you never have to remember what you said. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Buff5200 wrote: I watched the crash video frame-by-frame. Got a URL? The right main wheel appeared to separate from the gear 1/10 second before the right main gear collapsed. Then the left main gear collapsed, a few tenths after the right main. If the gear collapsed suddenly, then it was not inadvertently raised on the ground. Retraction is by a screw mechanism and takes a few seconds. George Patterson If you don't tell lies, you never have to remember what you said. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Dima Volodin" wrote in message
... James Robinson wrote: The B-17 bomber owned by the Experimental Aircraft Assn. was damaged yesterday at Van Nuys airport when its main gear collaped. Discovery Wings has just had a feature about "Aluminum Overcast"'s restoration :-( :-( Looks like they'll be able to get another few seasons out of it... :-( |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "G.R. Patterson III" wrote in message ... Buff5200 wrote: I watched the crash video frame-by-frame. Got a URL? The right main wheel appeared to separate from the gear 1/10 second before the right main gear collapsed. Then the left main gear collapsed, a few tenths after the right main. If the gear collapsed suddenly, then it was not inadvertently raised on the ground. Retraction is by a screw mechanism and takes a few seconds. George Patterson If you don't tell lies, you never have to remember what you said. I don't know how the retraction system works, so I 'm asking.. 1) Isn't the screw jack "sized" for air loads, with some sort of over center mechanism to handle the ground loads? 2) If that's the case, does the gear retraction mechanism have enough power to pull the gear back "under center" (?) while the aircraft is on the ground? 3) Would the screw jacks fail in this case? What I'm getting at is if someone flipped the wrong switch, could that explain the collapse of both mains, and explain why there are apparently broken screw jacks on both mains? Otherwise, I find it extremely unlikely that both gear systems (they are independant, right?) would have a similar mechanical failure at the same time... KB |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"Kyle Boatright" wrote: 1) Isn't the screw jack "sized" for air loads, with some sort of over center mechanism to handle the ground loads? No "over center" lock. 2) If that's the case, does the gear retraction mechanism have enough power to pull the gear back "under center" (?) while the aircraft is on the ground? Again, no "over center" lock. Yes, you can retract the gear on the ground. On the B-17 I flew there was a "weight on wheels" switch to prevent this but this was an add-on and might not be on all B-17s flying today. 3) Would the screw jacks fail in this case? I don't know. -- Dale L. Falk There is nothing - absolutely nothing - half so much worth doing as simply messing around with airplanes. http://home.gci.net/~sncdfalk/flying.html |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Kyle Boatright wrote: 1) Isn't the screw jack "sized" for air loads, with some sort of over center mechanism to handle the ground loads? No. The screw jack pushes against a knee-joint mechanism. The "hip" of this joint is attached to the firewall bulkhead and the "ankle" is attached to the bottom of the oleo strut. When the gear is full up, the joint is bent up into the housing and the screw mechanism is fairly short. When the gear is down, the knee-joint is straight, and the screw mechanism extended. The screw mechanism is also attached to the bulkhead in such a manner that it is horizontal when the gear is up. What I'm getting at is if someone flipped the wrong switch, could that explain the collapse of both mains, and explain why there are apparently broken screw jacks on both mains? I doubt it. If someone raised the gear on the ground, the plane would just settle on the wheels. Keep in mind that this mechanism was designed to handle at least 4 tons more than this particular aircraft weighed at the time of the incident. On the other hand, these things are ancient, so it might be possible. George Patterson If you don't tell lies, you never have to remember what you said. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Dima Volodin wrote: James Robinson wrote: The B-17 bomber owned by the Experimental Aircraft Assn. was damaged yesterday at Van Nuys airport when its main gear collaped. Discovery Wings has just had a feature about "Aluminum Overcast"'s restoration :-( Well, now they can turn it into a series. :-( George Patterson If you don't tell lies, you never have to remember what you said. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
EAA's B-17 "Aluminum Overcast" Gear collapse at Van Nuys airport | BlakeleyTB | Home Built | 4 | May 8th 04 06:15 AM |
Aluminum vs Fiberglass landing gear - Pro's and cons. | Bart Hull | Home Built | 1 | November 24th 03 02:46 PM |
Aluminum vs Fiberglass landing gear - Pro's and cons. | Bart Hull | Home Built | 2 | November 24th 03 05:23 AM |
Aluminum vs Fiberglass landing gear - Pro's and cons. | Bart Hull | Home Built | 0 | November 24th 03 03:52 AM |
Aluminum vs Fiberglass landing gear - Pro's and cons. | Bart D. Hull | Home Built | 0 | November 22nd 03 06:24 AM |