![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Rick Durden wrote: CAF is already saying the copilot pulled the gear up when he went for the flaps, despite being told to keep his hands off the flap switch until off the runway. As of today, EAA still denies this. They state that videos indicate that the gear was not completely down when the plane landed. George Patterson I childproofed my house, but they *still* get in. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"G.R. Patterson III" wrote: As of today, EAA still denies this. They state that videos indicate that the gear was not completely down when the plane landed. I guess that's possible. Would have to be a real good quality video since you'd have to be able to see if the scissor is overcenter. And, if they weren't down and locked the crew either wasn't doing their job or their procedures were bad. You can look at the gear from the cockpit and tell if it is locked down. That was our procedure on gear extension...a visual check that the gear was down and locked. And again, might odd that both gear suffered the same failure at the same time since they are separate systems....only common thing being the switch in the cockpit. And just because one gear fails there is no reason for the "good" gear to collapse....lots of cases of B-17s landing with only one gear down. -- Dale L. Falk There is nothing - absolutely nothing - half so much worth doing as simply messing around with airplanes. http://home.gci.net/~sncdfalk/flying.html |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Dale wrote: And again, might odd that both gear suffered the same failure at the same time since they are separate systems....only common thing being the switch in the cockpit. Only thing I can think of is that both motors quit prematurely. George Patterson I childproofed my house, but they *still* get in. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "G.R. Patterson III" wrote in message . Only thing I can think of is that both motors quit prematurely. Noticed that it looks like the ball turret remained intact. That's very interesting. My father's crew had a close call coming back from Gdynia, Poland in 1943 straight out of every B-17 movie made afterward; mains blown out by flak, ball turret jammed, plane coming home low on fuel and they had crossed the Wash before they managed to get the guy out; as soon as they landed, wheels up, the PAO had them formed up in front of an undamaged airplane for a photo. Interesting to know that Fred Holt might have survived anyway. -c |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() gatt wrote: Interesting to know that Fred Holt might have survived anyway. Key word is "might". With "Aluminum Overcast", the gear collapse happened when the plane was traveling at most 30 mph. I'd say there would probably be a big difference if that turret hits the runway at about 90. George Patterson I childproofed my house, but they *still* get in. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
EAA's B-17 "Aluminum Overcast" Gear collapse at Van Nuys airport | BlakeleyTB | Home Built | 4 | May 8th 04 06:15 AM |
Aluminum vs Fiberglass landing gear - Pro's and cons. | Bart Hull | Home Built | 1 | November 24th 03 02:46 PM |
Aluminum vs Fiberglass landing gear - Pro's and cons. | Bart Hull | Home Built | 2 | November 24th 03 05:23 AM |
Aluminum vs Fiberglass landing gear - Pro's and cons. | Bart Hull | Home Built | 0 | November 24th 03 03:52 AM |
Aluminum vs Fiberglass landing gear - Pro's and cons. | Bart D. Hull | Home Built | 0 | November 22nd 03 06:24 AM |