![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
![]() So what is the significance of it being redone relatively cheaply by garage level tinkerers and builders? It becomes available. What is the significance of spam cans costing seventeen thousand dollars an hour? Jose -- (for Email, make the obvious changes in my address) |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Teacherjh" wrote in message ... No, we didn't. Okay, you didn't know they had been done, but those of us with some knowledge of aerospace history did. |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Teacherjh" wrote in message ... It becomes available. For what? What is the significance of spam cans costing seventeen thousand dollars an hour? What spam can costs seventeen thousand dollars an hour? |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
And done for just a few piddly millions of dollars by nearly garage level
tinkers and builders? I think not.. So what is the significance of it being redone relatively cheaply by garage level tinkerers and builders? You answered your OWN question.....its CHEAPER...ALOT cheaper..... Lets face it..virtually everything everyone does as a job OR a hobby has no real "reason" for being done...other than there is a demand for it and its cheap enough that someone/someone else will pay to see/buy/do it/have it done for them..... Americans spend tens of BILLIONS on porn, makeup, and disco music every year..... Whats the point of those? Not a damn thing as far as I can tell.... take care Blll |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "BllFs6" wrote in message ... You answered your OWN question.....its CHEAPER... ALOT cheaper..... So something that has no practical purpose today can be done cheaper than it was when done by the government four decades ago, when it did have a practical purpose. Big deal. |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
So something that has no practical purpose today can be done cheaper than it
was when done by the government four decades ago, when it did have a practical purpose. Big deal. So porn, makeup, and disco music ARE "practical"? For every practical thing/job in existent I'll bet you can give 10 that are dedicated to "non-practical " pursuits....and thats what makes modern living so darn fun... If you can make an honest living giving people what they WANT...I say more power to ya.... Blll |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "BllFs6" wrote in message ... So porn, makeup, and disco music ARE "practical"? I don't see the connection. For every practical thing/job in existent I'll bet you can give 10 that are dedicated to "non-practical " pursuits....and thats what makes modern living so darn fun... I didn't say this shouldn't be done, I just asked what the point of the whole competition was. Someone said the ultimate goal is passenger hops as a commercial venture. I'm okay with that. If you can make an honest living giving people what they WANT...I say more power to ya.... Me too, I just didn't realize there was so much demand for suborbital hops. |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Aardvark" wrote in message news:58Voc.16596 100 km = 328084 feet Note the "N" number. N328KF ![]() Nice catch! A friend of mine also pointed out that SpaceShipOne's inaugural test flight was December 17, 2003 which would not be a coincidence. Rutan's padding his luck with aviation mojo. Yeah, that's it. : -c |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Steve Hix" wrote in message ... In article . net, "Steven P. McNicoll" wrote: "C J Campbell" wrote in message ... The earlier flights were not done in a re-usable spacecraft. So what? So that is a large part of what makes it different from the single-shot suborbital flights of the past. Not to mention the thousands of man-hours and cast of thousands needed to turn around the shuttle. One step on the road to non-government, gold-plated, decades-long development projects type spaceflight. The problem is that merely reaching the altitude is only a part of the problem. The real issue is achieving orbital velocity and the Rutan aircraft doesnt achive much more than 15% of the velocity required to put something in orbit. Keith |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Keith Willshaw" wrote in message ... The problem is that merely reaching the altitude is only a part of the problem. The real issue is achieving orbital velocity and the Rutan aircraft doesnt achive much more than 15% of the velocity required to put something in orbit. Why is that an issue? Reaching the altitude is all they're trying to do. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Rutan hits 200k feet! Almost there! | Thomas J. Paladino Jr. | Military Aviation | 150 | May 22nd 04 07:20 PM |
Spaceship 1 hits 212,000 feet!!!!!! | BlakeleyTB | Home Built | 10 | May 20th 04 10:12 PM |
Hiroshima/Nagasaki vs conventional B-17 bombing | zxcv | Military Aviation | 55 | April 4th 04 07:05 AM |
Looking for Cessna Caravan pilots | [email protected] | Owning | 9 | April 1st 04 02:54 AM |
Use of 150 octane fuel in the Merlin (Xylidine additive etc etc) | Peter Stickney | Military Aviation | 45 | February 11th 04 04:46 AM |