A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

First non-pilot passenger



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old May 29th 04, 02:14 PM
David Megginson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Louis L. Perley III wrote:

This wasn't a rental, I own this C152, so today I'll be heading back to
the airport with some Febreeze. Whoever came up with that stuff is a
genius!. Overall it mainly stayed in the carseat, so it wasn't as messy as I
feared it would be. It was one of the rare occasions when I was grateful to
have a plane made in the '70s complete with orange seats and carpeting which
will make any stains that much harder to spot.


First, congrats on your first passenger.

Beyond cleaning up messes, you'll find lots more reasons to be glad about
owning an inexpensive, older plane over the next few years. Of course,
you'll be down to driving speed (or worse) with a headwind, and I'm sure
you've already heard the joke about the Airworthiness Directive for
150/152's requiring you to reinforce the tail against bird strikes, but when
you're paying US $10-15/hour for gas, I bet that you'll be flying a lot
while the gas-guzzling twins and high-performance singles are just sitting
on the ramp (fuel-efficient Mooneys excepted, of course).

You'll probably also love your $500-$1,000 annuals, low insurance costs, and
the total lack of any temptation to go out and spend $20-30K to put in a new
leather interior or a Garmin stack. You also won't always be hovering
around fretting that the line guy is going to scratch your perfect paint
with the tractor or gas nozzle.


All the best,


David
  #2  
Old May 29th 04, 02:39 PM
Louis L. Perley III
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"David Megginson" wrote in message
.rogers.com...
Louis L. Perley III wrote:

This wasn't a rental, I own this C152, so today I'll be heading back

to
the airport with some Febreeze. Whoever came up with that stuff is a
genius!. Overall it mainly stayed in the carseat, so it wasn't as messy

as I
feared it would be. It was one of the rare occasions when I was grateful

to
have a plane made in the '70s complete with orange seats and carpeting

which
will make any stains that much harder to spot.


First, congrats on your first passenger.

Beyond cleaning up messes, you'll find lots more reasons to be glad about
owning an inexpensive, older plane over the next few years. Of course,
you'll be down to driving speed (or worse) with a headwind, and I'm sure
you've already heard the joke about the Airworthiness Directive for
150/152's requiring you to reinforce the tail against bird strikes, but

when
you're paying US $10-15/hour for gas, I bet that you'll be flying a lot
while the gas-guzzling twins and high-performance singles are just sitting
on the ramp (fuel-efficient Mooneys excepted, of course).

You'll probably also love your $500-$1,000 annuals, low insurance costs,

and
the total lack of any temptation to go out and spend $20-30K to put in a

new
leather interior or a Garmin stack. You also won't always be hovering
around fretting that the line guy is going to scratch your perfect paint
with the tractor or gas nozzle.


All the best,


David


This is exactly why I bought a C152 early in my training. I was doing
some calculations and wondered where all the cost of renting came from. Once
I calculated that I found that I could buy a decent bird for around ~25,000
and after that, as you say about the only hourly cost is fuel and oil.
Insurance and Annuals are once a year events that you just suck up and pay.
Simple airplane = simple maintenance and low-cost insurance so that too
keeps costs low. Since a C152 isn't really overpowered for the altitudes I
fly (BJC is 5500 ft) it would also force me to learn how to manage my power
and such much more carefully than if I flew a plane that I could just power
my way out of a problem (although I must admit when I fly the new 172SP I
love the way they seem to leap off the runway compared to what I fly, yes,
it's true what they say, you always want something bigger, faster, etc.) The
plan was to take my checkride in this particular airplane, but I also
quickly learned the hard part of being an owner when my engine started
making metal large enough to punch holes in the paper oil filter. I was
grounded two weeks before my checkride, which was taken in a rental. It took
me awhile due to outside activities to come up with money for a new engine,
but now that I've put her back together, it's like you said. I look outside,
weather is acceptable (and I've done everything on the honeydo list), I'll
go fly. Even with gas prices pretty high, it only cost me $20/hr. to fly,
excluding fixed costs. Those fixed costs I don't ever really figure into my
equation, because they come due regardless of how much I fly and compared to
club dues if I were renting, that pretty much covers insurance, and much the
same those dues would be paid monthly regardless of the amount I rented.
Annuals are a non-event costing $500 or so if I take the time to open up the
plane myself.
Jay Honeck is correct, we need to be better at spreading the word at how
low-cost flying can be. Sure I won't ever do significant business travel
with a C152, then again you can't spin a King Air. Aviation has it's trade
offs. If you can afford a new car (and really even if you can't), you can
get an airplane and really go somewhere. Since I now have two children, I
will eventually need a larger plane, but I don't think I could ever sell
N46000, it's just too much fun! I've now put in some additional avionics and
such, just here and there when money was available, so now I have an
airplane that is IFR capable, once I have the instrument checkride
completed, I'll have a low-cost way to maintain my currency.

--
Louis L. Perley III
N46000


  #3  
Old May 29th 04, 03:33 PM
Blanche
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Next time, don't let munchkins eat before flying. That may help.

"...if you can afford a new car, you can afford to fly..."

yup -- that's been my mantra for years. Pick a car. Any car. You
can find an airplane for that price.

It's entirely what you wish to do.

  #4  
Old May 29th 04, 04:09 PM
David Megginson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Louis L. Perley III wrote:

This is exactly why I bought a C152 early in my training. I was doing
some calculations and wondered where all the cost of renting came from. Once
I calculated that I found that I could buy a decent bird for around ~25,000
and after that, as you say about the only hourly cost is fuel and oil.
Insurance and Annuals are once a year events that you just suck up and pay.
Simple airplane = simple maintenance and low-cost insurance so that too
keeps costs low. Since a C152 isn't really overpowered for the altitudes I
fly (BJC is 5500 ft) it would also force me to learn how to manage my power
and such much more carefully than if I flew a plane that I could just power
my way out of a problem (although I must admit when I fly the new 172SP I
love the way they seem to leap off the runway compared to what I fly, yes,
it's true what they say, you always want something bigger, faster, etc.) The
plan was to take my checkride in this particular airplane, but I also
quickly learned the hard part of being an owner when my engine started
making metal large enough to punch holes in the paper oil filter. I was
grounded two weeks before my checkride, which was taken in a rental. It took
me awhile due to outside activities to come up with money for a new engine,
but now that I've put her back together, it's like you said. I look outside,
weather is acceptable (and I've done everything on the honeydo list), I'll
go fly. Even with gas prices pretty high, it only cost me $20/hr. to fly,
excluding fixed costs. Those fixed costs I don't ever really figure into my
equation, because they come due regardless of how much I fly and compared to
club dues if I were renting, that pretty much covers insurance, and much the
same those dues would be paid monthly regardless of the amount I rented.
Annuals are a non-event costing $500 or so if I take the time to open up the
plane myself.
Jay Honeck is correct, we need to be better at spreading the word at how
low-cost flying can be. Sure I won't ever do significant business travel
with a C152, then again you can't spin a King Air. Aviation has it's trade
offs. If you can afford a new car (and really even if you can't), you can
get an airplane and really go somewhere. Since I now have two children, I
will eventually need a larger plane, but I don't think I could ever sell
N46000, it's just too much fun! I've now put in some additional avionics and
such, just here and there when money was available, so now I have an
airplane that is IFR capable, once I have the instrument checkride
completed, I'll have a low-cost way to maintain my currency.

--
Louis L. Perley III
N46000


  #5  
Old May 29th 04, 04:19 PM
David Megginson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Louis L. Perley III wrote:

This is exactly why I bought a C152 early in my training. I was doing
some calculations and wondered where all the cost of renting came from. Once
I calculated that I found that I could buy a decent bird for around ~25,000
and after that, as you say about the only hourly cost is fuel and oil.


.... and engine reserve (as you've already realized), but I'm guessing that's
a pretty small number for you averaged out over TBO, despite the pain of
your recent overhaul. Did you buy the plane with a runout engine, or did it
catch you by surprise?


Keep having fun.


All the best,


David
  #6  
Old May 29th 04, 07:44 PM
Louis L. Perley III
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"David Megginson" wrote in message
. rogers.com...

... and engine reserve (as you've already realized), but I'm guessing

that's
a pretty small number for you averaged out over TBO, despite the pain of
your recent overhaul. Did you buy the plane with a runout engine, or did

it
catch you by surprise?


When I bought the airplane it had the original engine with 2200 hours on
it, so I knew it was coming. I figured I'd be able to get to the 2400 hour
TBO pretty handily because the plane had never been used as a trainer, it
was used regularly by a handful of ranchers to count cattle in South Dakota
and Colorado. The engine was still running strong, and the first oil change
came out pretty clean, however the next change was completely different
(making serious metal) so I grounded the airplane. Although I knew the
overhaul was coming, I thought I was going to at least get through my
private with what the engine had left. The original idea was also to sell it
to someone who wanted to do an overhaul, and move up to a C172 for
instrument training. I never intended to keep it. According to my logbooks,
I flew ~71 hours before the engine quit, so I definitely had some use of it.
At that point I didn't want to spend the money on an overhaul because I
figured I'd need that money for a 172 and didn't see that I'd get my money
back from an overhaul and then selling directly afterwards. My first
daughter was born shortly afterwards and flying became a second-tier
activity so the plane sat there for a bit. I finally came to my senses and
realized that most of my flying would be alone and spending the money for a
new engine would still leave me better off than spending twice that much for
a clapped out 172, and I already knew the airplane. Thus began my restore of
Willie (the name was not chosen by me but by it's previous owner, it's still
on the key ring so the name stuck), put a new engine under the cowling,
added another radio with glideslope receiver/antenna and marker beacon with
audio panel. I was able to find all the pieces I needed used/yellow tagged,
so it wasn't that pricey. The radios were weak when they became warm, so I'd
have to keep one off until I needed to check ATIS, etc. I've recently added
an avionics fan and that has made a world of difference performance wise and
I can once again use both radios without problems. I'll never use it for
serious IFR, but in reality, you can't do that with a 172 either.

--
Louis L. Perley III
N46000


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 02:26 PM
Pilot Error? Is it Mr. Damron? Badwater Bill Home Built 3 June 23rd 04 04:05 PM
Student as PIC in IMC? Geo. Anderson Instrument Flight Rules 40 May 29th 04 05:09 PM
Real stats on engine failures? Captain Wubba Piloting 127 December 8th 03 04:09 PM
AmeriFlight Crash C J Campbell Piloting 5 December 1st 03 02:13 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:55 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.