![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"David Megginson" wrote in message
. rogers.com... ... and engine reserve (as you've already realized), but I'm guessing that's a pretty small number for you averaged out over TBO, despite the pain of your recent overhaul. Did you buy the plane with a runout engine, or did it catch you by surprise? When I bought the airplane it had the original engine with 2200 hours on it, so I knew it was coming. I figured I'd be able to get to the 2400 hour TBO pretty handily because the plane had never been used as a trainer, it was used regularly by a handful of ranchers to count cattle in South Dakota and Colorado. The engine was still running strong, and the first oil change came out pretty clean, however the next change was completely different (making serious metal) so I grounded the airplane. Although I knew the overhaul was coming, I thought I was going to at least get through my private with what the engine had left. The original idea was also to sell it to someone who wanted to do an overhaul, and move up to a C172 for instrument training. I never intended to keep it. According to my logbooks, I flew ~71 hours before the engine quit, so I definitely had some use of it. At that point I didn't want to spend the money on an overhaul because I figured I'd need that money for a 172 and didn't see that I'd get my money back from an overhaul and then selling directly afterwards. My first daughter was born shortly afterwards and flying became a second-tier activity so the plane sat there for a bit. I finally came to my senses and realized that most of my flying would be alone and spending the money for a new engine would still leave me better off than spending twice that much for a clapped out 172, and I already knew the airplane. Thus began my restore of Willie (the name was not chosen by me but by it's previous owner, it's still on the key ring so the name stuck), put a new engine under the cowling, added another radio with glideslope receiver/antenna and marker beacon with audio panel. I was able to find all the pieces I needed used/yellow tagged, so it wasn't that pricey. The radios were weak when they became warm, so I'd have to keep one off until I needed to check ATIS, etc. I've recently added an avionics fan and that has made a world of difference performance wise and I can once again use both radios without problems. I'll never use it for serious IFR, but in reality, you can't do that with a 172 either. -- Louis L. Perley III N46000 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Pilot Error? Is it Mr. Damron? | Badwater Bill | Home Built | 3 | June 23rd 04 04:05 PM |
Student as PIC in IMC? | Geo. Anderson | Instrument Flight Rules | 40 | May 29th 04 05:09 PM |
Real stats on engine failures? | Captain Wubba | Piloting | 127 | December 8th 03 04:09 PM |
AmeriFlight Crash | C J Campbell | Piloting | 5 | December 1st 03 02:13 PM |