![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You are correct; the altitudes are not depicted.
-- David Brooks "kage" wrote in message ... I don't have the sectional here with me, in Roskilde. But I think the altitudes are NOT depicted as well. Karl "David Brooks" wrote in message ... "kage" wrote in message ... The new Seattle sectional and terminal chart have the TFR's mapped. I guess they are here to stay. Putting aside the thread about whether they are really temporary or not, what about the depiction itself? They show: - Land areas white (i.e. no elevation information, but that's not a problem in these cases) - In the larger ones (where there is room for it), a thick blue dash outline - A small notation pointing to the TFR. Without the notation, they'd be easy to miss. Is that depiction standard for TFRs, or did NACO just make them up? I don't see a reference in my copy of the VFR Symbols Guide. -- David Brooks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
WAC vs Sectional | [email protected] | Instrument Flight Rules | 60 | February 8th 05 12:22 AM |
WAC vs Sectional | [email protected] | General Aviation | 12 | February 2nd 05 03:03 PM |
Are sectional paths correct across "long" distances? | vincent p. norris | Piloting | 36 | March 25th 04 02:32 PM |
AVIATIONTOOLBOX: how I convert sectional maps to map chunks | Kyler Laird | General Aviation | 2 | December 4th 03 01:09 AM |
Old New York Sectional | PaulaJay1 | Owning | 2 | November 25th 03 03:27 AM |