![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"John R" wrote in message ...
[...] So according to the chart, the Class D airspace extends to 2500 feet. However, Quonset tower was sternly warning pilots the other day that their Class D only went to 1300 feet and not to exceed that without the blessing of Providence. So why does the chart say 2500 feet for the Class D inside the Class C ring? Because that's what they write at all the Class D airports, as near as I can tell. They just look at the airport elevation, add 500', and put that on the chart. We have several Class D airports in our region that underlie the SeaTac Class B airspace. All have letters of agreement with the SEA approach facility reducing their Class D ceiling. In one case, the Class D ceiling is the Class B floor (BFI), and in the other cases, the reduced ceiling of the Class D either creates or expands a charted Class E area between the Class D and Class B airspace. The situation around BFI sounds most similar to yours, where the charted Class D overlaps with the Class C airspace. Frankly, I find the whole thing very confusing. In the case of BFI, it's (almost) clear, because the floor of the Class B is clearly marked as being below the marked ceiling of the Class D. You know (that is, you can assume) you're either in Class D or Class B, and it's very clear where the Class B ends. But in the other cases, it's not clear at all if what's really going on is that the airspace ceded to the SEA approach facility winds up being Class E, or if it's Class D or Class B (and controlled by SEA App/Dep either way). I have always treated the ceded airspace as Class E and no one has ever taken me to task, even when I was on a tower frequency. So I presume that's fine to do. But the whole situation highlights the incredibly poor degree to which these letters of agreement and related arrangements are communicated to the pilots that they affect. Pete |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NAS and associated computer system | Newps | Instrument Flight Rules | 8 | August 12th 04 05:12 AM |
AOPA Sells-Out California Pilots in Military Airspace Grab? | Larry Dighera | Instrument Flight Rules | 12 | April 26th 04 06:12 PM |
AOPA Sells-Out California Pilots in Military Airspace Grab? | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 12 | April 26th 04 06:12 PM |
Violating Airspace with GPS | John Bell | Piloting | 57 | November 5th 03 08:25 PM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |