A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Garmin(R) G1000(TM) All-Glass Flightdeck Certified in the Cessna Skylane



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old June 22nd 04, 10:24 PM
Andrew Gideon
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Teacherjh wrote:


I've never noticed at what point in the GPS startup the VOR receiver in
the 430 starts working.


I'm talking about a standalone steam gauge VOR.


I understand. But the issue you've raised is comparing a glass panel to a
"steam gauge" panel. One variable in this comparison is how rapidly the
VORs will come back online. That's the issue to which I don't know the
answer...but I can check easily enough.

This isn't just for you. You've made me curious, since half my VOR receiver
capacity is in a 430.

And while true, glass or
no glass, GPS needs to acquire satellites, my point is more along the line
of "it's not true that new is always better in every way" - glass or GPS
or Windows.


I don't want to fall into a Windows debate here, but suffice it to say that
Windows fails your "new" test. It's only recently entered the 1980s in
terms of operating system (as opposed to all the other nonsense shoved on
top) technology.

Still, I agree in general that new does not imply better. On the other
hand, I do believe that Glass Panels are an improvement over Steam Gauges.
I've yet to try them myself sob! but every serious review speaks both of
the learning curve and the lack of interest in going back.

- Andrew

  #12  
Old June 22nd 04, 10:29 PM
kage
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

******"it's not true that new is always better in every way"**** But in
Avionics it is true, VERY true.

There is NO comparison. The glass cockpit is vastly superior to the old
electro/mechanical gauges in EVERY respect, especially in reliability.

I spent decades flying corporate King Airs, all with the miserable old
stuff. The old stuff is pure junk and always VERY expensive to maintain.
This last decade I've been flying the Falcon 50EX and Lear 31A, both with
glass. Hands down winner. A good comparison would be the old Magnavox consol
TV, which needs a resident technician, and a modern TV, which never wears
out till you throw it away.

Karl
BE-30
CE-500
Lr-Jet
FA-50

"Teacherjh" wrote in message
...

I've never noticed at what point in the GPS startup the VOR receiver in

the
430 starts working.


I'm talking about a standalone steam gauge VOR. And while true, glass or

no
glass, GPS needs to acquire satellites, my point is more along the line of
"it's not true that new is always better in every way" - glass or GPS or
Windows.

Jose



--
(for Email, make the obvious changes in my address)



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
C182 Glass Panel Scott Schluer Piloting 15 February 27th 04 03:52 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.