![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
The FARs only have a concept of PIC, and do not have a concept of Top Dog vs. HOT. They certainly DO have the =concept= of Top Dog vs. HOT. They just don't call it that. 1.1 of the FARs (I still call it that) defines the CONCEPT of Top Dog, and gives it the moniker "Pilot in Command". 61.51 defines the CONCEPT of HOT (by using it in 61.51 e 1 i) but doesn't call it anything. It also uses the CONCEPT of Top Dog (by using it in 61.51 e 1 iii and calling it Pilot In Command). Although they have the same name, they are different CONCEPTS. 61.51 e 1 states that you can log "Pilot in command time" if you are HOT and rated, or in some cases when you are Top Dog. The FARs are not well written. Whether this is deliberate or not is open to discussion (but nothing complicated written by lawyers is an accident, and nothing simple written by lawyers exists). Jose -- (for Email, make the obvious changes in my address) |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 03:26 PM |
| Diamond DA-40 with G-1000 pirep | C J Campbell | Instrument Flight Rules | 117 | July 22nd 04 06:40 PM |
| Diamond DA-40 with G-1000 pirep | C J Campbell | Piloting | 114 | July 22nd 04 06:40 PM |
| British pilot (in Britain), survives forced mountain landing | Tim K | Piloting | 3 | July 11th 03 05:14 PM |