|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
August 24th 04, 05:39 PM
|
|||
|
|||
"Ron Rosenfeld" wrote in message
... On Mon, 23 Aug 2004 12:29:09 -0700, "David Brooks" wrote: However, now the thread has brought up the emphasis on "enroute to the departure runway"... does that mean a taxi instruction from the same runway intersection back to the same parking does *not* imply a clearance to cross intervening runways? That hadn't occurred to me before, and seems to compound the confusion. According to the AIM, it *DOES* imply a clearance to cross all intervening runways: "In the absence of holding instructions, a clearance to "taxi to" any point other than an assigned takeoff runway is a clearance to cross ALL runways that intersect the taxi route to that point." (emphasis mine). Ah, yes. Should have read on to paragraph 6. Back to your regular scheduled misunderstandings. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| NASA Jet Might Have Hit Record 5,000 Mph | Garrison Hilliard | Military Aviation | 0 | March 28th 04 04:03 PM |
| Zero - specific questions | N-6 | Military Aviation | 30 | November 21st 03 02:44 AM |
| Runway Incursion and NASA form | Koopas Ly | Piloting | 16 | November 12th 03 01:37 AM |
| Runway Incursion and NASA form | steve mew | Piloting | 0 | November 10th 03 05:37 AM |
| Moving violation..NASA form? | Nasir | Piloting | 47 | November 5th 03 07:56 PM |
Hybrid Mode
