A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Another headset question, again..



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 14th 04, 03:53 AM
H.P.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Ham DX'rs don't operate with engines at 2500 rpm on the backside of their
rigs.
Most important in aviation is speech intelligibility with noise. I think
aviation haedsets need not only ANR but compression, as well.




"R. David Steele" /OMEGA wrote in message
...
On 10 Sep 2004 01:50:13 GMT, Andrew Sarangan
wrote:

|
|
|I use a Denali ANR, and love it. I also have a Peltor passive headset
which
|I hadn't worn in a long time. Just the other day, I wore the Peltor, and
|found it to be surprisingly close to the Denali. In fact, with the ANR
off,
|the Peltor seemed WAY better than the Denali. The Pelor does have a
tighter
|grip on the head, but that doesn't seem to bother me too much. I was
|considering investing in a Peltor ANR. The trouble is, not many
pilotshops
|seem to carry Peltor products. I am not sure why. Even the Peltor website
|does not have any information about their aviation headsets. Any info on
|this would be appreciated.
|
|

Keep Heil Sound in mind. They are making their first ventures
into aviation headsets. Their primary business has been
communication mikes and headsets plus commerical (ie broadcast
and bands) mikes. http://www.heilsound.com/


Their Pro Quiet Sound headset is going to be a top ranked ANR
http://www.heilsound.com/pro_set_quiet_phone.htm
It is priced for $225. The only problem is that they terminate
their mikes with a minature plug (3.5mm) then use adapters for
whatever radio they are linking to. One could just replace the
3.5mm plug with a .206" plug (ie Switchcraft 480 or 484, with hot
on the ring and gnd on the sleave) or make an adapter with a
3.5mm inline jack to .206" plug.

Frankly Bob Heil might have a far better headset than Bose. Go
through his web site. He started with the Who. The Eagles are
using his mikes.

Try the HC-4 mike element. It has a narrower range which punches
through noise better (500 Hz to 3,800 Hz with 10 dB rise at 2,000
Hz). The HC-5 has a wider range, 350 Hz to 4,000 Hz with 6 dB
rise at 2,000 Hz, which sounds more normal. How many headset
makers offer a selection of mike elements? BTW, he does have an
element just for ICOM radios (low audio).


"If ye love wealth better than liberty ... servitude better than ...
freedom,
go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsel or your arms ... May
your
chains set lightly upon you. May posterity forget that ye were our
countrymen."
- Samuel Adams



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
VOR/DME Approach Question Chip Jones Instrument Flight Rules 47 August 29th 04 05:03 AM
Bose makes good on my wife's headset. Kyler Laird General Aviation 3 March 10th 04 02:08 PM
Bose makes good on my wife's headset. Kyler Laird Piloting 3 March 10th 04 02:08 PM
Legal question - Pilot liability and possible involvement with a crime John Piloting 5 November 20th 03 09:40 PM
Question about Question 4488 [email protected] Instrument Flight Rules 3 October 27th 03 01:26 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:42 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.