A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

FAA Goes after Chicago on Meigs



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 2nd 04, 01:45 AM
Jay Honeck
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Gee, $33K? About the price of a used Cherokee 140?

Big whoop. Ten parking meters on Wacker Drive make that in six months...

I'm heartened that the FAA is closing the door after the cows have escaped,
and sincerely hope that King Daley is quaking in his boots.
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"


  #2  
Old October 2nd 04, 02:05 AM
Peter Duniho
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Jay Honeck" wrote in message
news:FSm7d.303820$Fg5.269114@attbi_s53...
Gee, $33K? About the price of a used Cherokee 140?

Big whoop. Ten parking meters on Wacker Drive make that in six months...

I'm heartened that the FAA is closing the door after the cows have
escaped,
and sincerely hope that King Daley is quaking in his boots.


You must have missed the part where Chicago could be on the hook for as much
as $6 million total (not counting the $33K penalty for violating the 30-day
notice requirement).

The 30-day notice requirement violation is a relatively minor infraction,
and as such wouldn't justify a very large penalty. Diverting funds
illegally is a much more egregious violation, and carries with it a much
greater penalty.

I think it's great news that the FAA is taking action against Chicago, and I
found nothing negative in the posted press release at all.

Pete


  #3  
Old October 2nd 04, 02:30 AM
Dave Stadt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Peter Duniho" wrote in message
...
"Jay Honeck" wrote in message
news:FSm7d.303820$Fg5.269114@attbi_s53...
Gee, $33K? About the price of a used Cherokee 140?

Big whoop. Ten parking meters on Wacker Drive make that in six

months...

I'm heartened that the FAA is closing the door after the cows have
escaped,
and sincerely hope that King Daley is quaking in his boots.


You must have missed the part where Chicago could be on the hook for as

much
as $6 million total (not counting the $33K penalty for violating the

30-day
notice requirement).

The 30-day notice requirement violation is a relatively minor infraction,
and as such wouldn't justify a very large penalty. Diverting funds
illegally is a much more egregious violation, and carries with it a much
greater penalty.

I think it's great news that the FAA is taking action against Chicago, and

I
found nothing negative in the posted press release at all.

Pete



Like any of it is going to stick. $33K, $1.5 Million or $6 million its all
peanuts to the city of chicago. Where else can a mayor buy his wife a
lakefront park for that kind of money?



  #4  
Old October 3rd 04, 12:34 AM
Mike O'Malley
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Dave Stadt" wrote in message
...

"Peter Duniho" wrote in message
...
"Jay Honeck" wrote in message
news:FSm7d.303820$Fg5.269114@attbi_s53...
Gee, $33K? About the price of a used Cherokee 140?

Big whoop. Ten parking meters on Wacker Drive make that in six

months...

I'm heartened that the FAA is closing the door after the cows have
escaped,
and sincerely hope that King Daley is quaking in his boots.


You must have missed the part where Chicago could be on the hook for as

much
as $6 million total (not counting the $33K penalty for violating the

30-day
notice requirement).

The 30-day notice requirement violation is a relatively minor

infraction,
and as such wouldn't justify a very large penalty. Diverting funds
illegally is a much more egregious violation, and carries with it a much
greater penalty.

I think it's great news that the FAA is taking action against Chicago,

and
I
found nothing negative in the posted press release at all.

Pete



Like any of it is going to stick. $33K, $1.5 Million or $6 million its all
peanuts to the city of chicago. Where else can a mayor buy his wife a
lakefront park for that kind of money?


Really. As I recall the recently finished Millennium Park was around $375
million OVER budget and 4 years late. I can only guess what this new park
will cost, and anything the FAA fines them will be a drop in the bucket.


  #5  
Old October 3rd 04, 03:04 PM
Dan Luke
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Dave Stadt" wrote:
I think it's great news that the FAA is taking action against
Chicago, and

I
found nothing negative in the posted press release at all.

Pete



Like any of it is going to stick. $33K, $1.5 Million or $6 million its
all
peanuts to the city of chicago. Where else can a mayor buy his wife a
lakefront park for that kind of money?


And Daley will no doubt spin himself a role as the heroic defender of
the city persecuted by the big, bad feds.
--
Dan
C172RG at BFM


  #6  
Old October 3rd 04, 05:04 AM
Orval Fairbairn
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
"Peter Duniho" wrote:

"Jay Honeck" wrote in message
news:FSm7d.303820$Fg5.269114@attbi_s53...
Gee, $33K? About the price of a used Cherokee 140?

Big whoop. Ten parking meters on Wacker Drive make that in six months...

I'm heartened that the FAA is closing the door after the cows have
escaped,
and sincerely hope that King Daley is quaking in his boots.


You must have missed the part where Chicago could be on the hook for as much
as $6 million total (not counting the $33K penalty for violating the 30-day
notice requirement).

The 30-day notice requirement violation is a relatively minor infraction,
and as such wouldn't justify a very large penalty. Diverting funds
illegally is a much more egregious violation, and carries with it a much
greater penalty.

I think it's great news that the FAA is taking action against Chicago, and I
found nothing negative in the posted press release at all.

Pete



Perhaps diverting funds qualifies Daley for RICO (racketeering) charges.
I would LOVE to see him go to Leavenworth!
  #7  
Old October 2nd 04, 01:55 PM
Matt Whiting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Jay Honeck wrote:

Gee, $33K? About the price of a used Cherokee 140?

Big whoop. Ten parking meters on Wacker Drive make that in six months...

I'm heartened that the FAA is closing the door after the cows have escaped,
and sincerely hope that King Daley is quaking in his boots.


Yes, my thoughts exactly. And why wait so long to act?


Matt

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FAA Goes after Chicago on Meigs Orval Fairbairn Home Built 48 October 5th 04 11:46 AM
FAA Goes after Chicago on Meigs Orval Fairbairn General Aviation 46 October 5th 04 11:46 AM
Chicago Meigs Airport Dead Fitzair4 Home Built 4 April 16th 04 10:40 PM
a brief blurb on meigs Tune2828 Piloting 0 January 20th 04 04:04 PM
Emergency landing at Meigs Sunday Thomas J. Paladino Jr. Piloting 22 August 3rd 03 03:14 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:32 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.