|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
October 15th 04, 06:36 PM
|
|||
|
|||
zatatime wrote:
On Fri, 15 Oct 2004 11:36:43 -0400, Todd Pattist wrote: I note that Mr. Lynch's comments are not definitive and he's been wrong before How can the guy who wrote 61 be wrong about the interpretation of 61? Because first, much of Part 61 predates Mr. Lynch's meddling with it. Second, the rules were NOT enacted as he wrote them but substantially revised during the rulemaking process. Third, his opinion bears no offical weight. To get an official opinion you need a decision from the FAA Legal Counsel's office (which has rightfully disagreed with the FAQ). Even ALJ decisions don't form a precedent in the morass which is the FAA enforcement system. The NTSB appeals do, but the FAA still tries to ignore them. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
