![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The reason that VDPs were developed is (as always) because of an accident. A
flight crew mistakenly identified the lights of a carnival with the runway environment and descended early...into terrain. There is no excuse, no loophole, for descending early....the consequences might be tragic. If you fly the approach as if no VDP is provided, you will maintain the MDA until you either pick up the runway visually or reach the MAP. In any case, in murky conditions pilots should stay about 50 feet above touchdown zone elevation until they see the green lights pass beneath the aircraft (Gardner's Rule of Longevity). Bob Gardner Bob Gardner "MH" wrote in message ... It's my understanding that if an instrument approach includes a VDP, you should not descend below the MDA prior to reaching this point. If you're not equipped to identify the VDP you should fly the approach as if no VDP is provided. I've been told you're not _authorized_ to descend prior the VDP but that makes little sense. If you fly the approach without being able to identify the VDP you may well descend prior to the VDP without even realizing it and that would still be acceptable. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Descending through a thin icing layer | Wyatt Emmerich | Instrument Flight Rules | 70 | December 31st 03 05:17 AM |