![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "David Brooks" wrote in message ... That being so, and despite what should be an apolitical setting, I can no longer in good faith keep company with a group of which the majority, I know, has elected to deliver the country I love, and chose as my home, into the hands of Bush and his repressive, regressive masters. Get a $&%@!ing helmet, dude. I'm a pro-life, pro-gun, low-tax Republican living in Boston, Massachusetts for the past ten years. Most of the people I know don't understand how an educated, reasonable person like me could vote for "that chimp." One of my best friends is a hardcore lesbian environmental journalist who went to Smith, and I've worked on the staff of one of the alternative newspapers up here. Let's just say that when I went to the Halloween party this year, all the goths, gays, trannies, and just plain weirdos looked at me like I was the freak. Well hey, in Cambridge, I am. These people are mad Kerry didn't run a liberal campaign and can't stand that he "was just as pro-war as Bush." Given the choice they'd like us to pull out of Iraq and beg the UN's forgiveness, raise taxes back to 70% on income over $200k, tax gas at $3/gallon, ban every gun out there, and make gay sex a part of grade-school curricula. Need I say that I think their policies would devastate this country just as terribly as you think W's policies will? Still, I've managed to become and remain friends with quite a few of these people because I realize that they're not actually bad people, just misguided. Naturally they feel the same about me. Some of them I'm happy to have long debates with over vast quantities of alcohol, others I only talk about other topics with. Life goes on and is richer for the company of people who think differently than I do. 51% of this country did not vote for fascism, they voted for George W. Bush. There's a difference if you care to see it. -cwk. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Still, I've managed to become and remain friends with quite a few of these
people because I realize that they're not actually bad people, just misguided. Naturally they feel the same about me. Some of them I'm happy to have long debates with over vast quantities of alcohol, others I only talk about other topics with. Life goes on and is richer for the company of people who think differently than I do. Precisely. Well said. Our best friends are both liberal Democrats. We watched the election results together last night, much like watching Monday Night Football. We had the same snacks, the same drinks -- and the same cheering and booing. For David to take this kind of thing so seriously that he's "leaving the community" is bizarre to the point of absurdity. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
These people are mad Kerry didn't run a liberal campaign and can't stand
that he "was just as pro-war as Bush." That is SO ironic. If the Democrats has nominated a middle-of-the-road guy to run against Bush -- say, Dick Gephardt -- this election would not have even been close. The Democrats would have swept the nation, and never by less than 25 percentage points. Stupidly, they nominated a guy whose political positions were to the left of Ted Kennedy's, absolutely ensuring a Bush victory. There were many traditional Republicans out here -- myself included -- who would have voted for a conservative Democrat in this election. But there was just no way for any of us to vote for a guy like Kerry. The moral for the Democrats: Don't ever nominate an ultra liberal to run for president again. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jay Honeck" wrote in message news:k_bid.351511$MQ5.252777@attbi_s52... These people are mad Kerry didn't run a liberal campaign and can't stand that he "was just as pro-war as Bush." The moral for the Democrats: Don't ever nominate an ultra liberal to run for president again. Hillary Clinton. With Barack Obama for VP, of course. Too soon for him to run for Prez. but he's going to get there sooner or later unless he has an intern problem. 2008 will be a slugfest extraordinaire. First in 50 years that you'll have a completely open race with neither an incumbent nor VP on either ticket. My dream team is Giuliani-Rice. Not likely to happen but the Red Sox weren't supposed to beat the Yankees after being down 0-3 either. That team could put nearly the entire country in play. -cwk. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "C Kingsbury" wrote in message nk.net... "Jay Honeck" wrote in message news:k_bid.351511$MQ5.252777@attbi_s52... ....snip... The moral for the Democrats: Don't ever nominate an ultra liberal to run for president again. Hillary Clinton. ....snip... My dream team is Giuliani-Rice. ...snip... It would be interesting to see if the (conservative) country is ready for a Woman in the White House, or even in the position of "heartbeat away". That's kind of a "liberal" concept, isn't it???... |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 3 Nov 2004 17:44:52 -0500, "Icebound"
wrote: "C Kingsbury" wrote in message ink.net... "Jay Honeck" wrote in message news:k_bid.351511$MQ5.252777@attbi_s52... ...snip... The moral for the Democrats: Don't ever nominate an ultra liberal to run for president again. Hillary Clinton. ...snip... My dream team is Giuliani-Rice. ...snip... It would be interesting to see if the (conservative) country is ready for a Woman in the White House, or even in the position of "heartbeat away". That's kind of a "liberal" concept, isn't it???... This is a sad comment to make in the greatest country in the world, but my sense is that any party that nominates a woman for president or vice-president has conceded the election before it starts. For reasons that I cannot fathom, this country is not even close to being ready for that scenario. We'll accept female governors, supreme court justices, CEO's, etc, but not president or vp. We are way behind the rest of the world in that regard. Rich Russell |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
This is a sad comment to make in the greatest country in the world,
but my sense is that any party that nominates a woman for president or vice-president has conceded the election before it starts. I disagree. I think America is MORE than ready to elect a conservative Republican woman president/vice-president. But Hillary? Never. She polarizes everyone she meets -- there is no middle ground with her, in large part due to her husband's "legacy." It's kind of a shame, cuz she's a bright woman in many ways. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 04 Nov 2004 14:13:47 GMT, "Jay Honeck"
wrote: This is a sad comment to make in the greatest country in the world, but my sense is that any party that nominates a woman for president or vice-president has conceded the election before it starts. I disagree. I think America is MORE than ready to elect a conservative Republican woman president/vice-president. But Hillary? Never. She polarizes everyone she meets -- there is no middle ground with her, in large part due to her husband's "legacy." It's kind of a shame, cuz she's a bright woman in many ways. Well, Jay, I half agree with you. I do not agree that America is ready to elect a woman president/vp but I absolutely agree that *when* it finally does happen, it will be a conservative Republican. I also agree that Hillary is a very intelligent woman who is patently unelectable (at least in the context of the offices that we're talking about). Just so there is no confusion on my position: when I say the country is not ready, I am not espousing that as my personal position. I don't have any problem with a woman president. Rich Russell |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jay Honeck" wrote in message news:vOqid.353905$MQ5.219330@attbi_s52... It's kind of a shame, cuz she's a bright woman in many ways. Bright? Yes, but that's a morally-neutral statement. -cwk. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Richard Russell" wrote in message ... This is a sad comment to make in the greatest country in the world, but my sense is that any party that nominates a woman for president or vice-president has conceded the election before it starts. I think Jean Kirkpatrick could have been elected, possibly in a landslide. Her "Blame America First" speech created a lot of support for her. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Leaving the community | David Brooks | Instrument Flight Rules | 556 | November 30th 04 08:08 PM |
aero-domains for anybody in the aviation community | secura | Aviation Marketplace | 1 | June 26th 04 07:37 PM |
Unruly Passengers | SelwayKid | Piloting | 88 | June 5th 04 08:35 AM |
Report Leaving Assigned Altitude? | John Clonts | Instrument Flight Rules | 81 | March 20th 04 02:34 PM |
Big Kahunas | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 360 | December 20th 03 12:59 AM |