Zoom fables on ANN ZZZZZZZZZZZZ

On Tue, 20 Jul 2004 02:24:21 GMT, Juan Jimenez
wrote:

ChuckSlusarczyk wrote in
:

This paragraph explains why I published this post. If zoom can tell
the flying public about people he claims to not have nbeen truth full
.I can also tell the flying public that zoom is not truthfull and not
to be trusted.

Still making up stories as usual. I suppose you're still lining up those
little ducks of yours, eh? We waited with the charcoal and sauce, and you
never showed up. Like the say where I come from, "perro que ladra no
muerde." Must be your family crest motto.

So for as long as he continues to play the role he does I will continue
to expose him for what he truly is, a "Phony". That's my and a lot of
other peoples opinion .....nuff said .You can read what they said
about jaun yourself it's another hoot...

Sure is! One thing's for sure, it doesn't talk about children suing their
parents to get their salaries paid, or about tales of never bringing what
you own to places down south because it could get taken away, or about drug
addicted family members losing their children's custody and publishing
their whining stories on the Internet.

I guess it's true what they say, useless people never change. You're living
proof of that. It's all about the credibility that you've never had.

Juan

plonk!

Juan,

If any of that is true then simply post the names/places
details, etc. You, of all people, should know that TRUTH is
the best defense to a slander libel charge.

IF you're telling the truth then simply post the details.

In other words, PUT UP OR SHUT UP.....

How does that little jet of yours fly?? Maybe you can have
Jimbo take it for its first flight if you're not ready for
that experience....

John

John Ammeter wrote in
:

Juan,

If any of that is true then simply post the names/places
details, etc. You, of all people, should know that TRUTH is
the best defense to a slander libel charge

Got more interesting and useful things to do, John. Besides, Chuck has
never been interested in the truth, that's why he's still mouthing off
about ducks and hoots and other assorted BS. It's actually a pitiful
sight -- a grown man, reduced to inane whining on Usenet while the rest of
the world continues to revolve, just not around him.

How does that little jet of yours fly??

We're going find out, very soon, thanks for asking. I'm looking for a 10-
516000-1 to replace an underpowered 10-378340-1 and get a reliable engine
start (0.3 joule vs 2.0 joule), care to donate one to the cause?

Juan

From: Juan Jimenez
Date: 7/19/2004 10:21 PM Central Daylight Time
Message-id:

John Ammeter wrote in
:

Juan,

If any of that is true then simply post the names/places
details, etc. You, of all people, should know that TRUTH is
the best defense to a slander libel charge

Got more interesting and useful things to do, John. Besides, Chuck has
never been interested in the truth, that's why he's still mouthing off
about ducks and hoots and other assorted BS. It's actually a pitiful
sight -- a grown man, reduced to inane whining on Usenet while the rest of
the world continues to revolve, just not around him.

In other words you have no proof.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

In article , B2431 says...
Got more interesting and useful things to do, John. Besides, Chuck has
never been interested in the truth, that's why he's still mouthing off
about ducks and hoots and other assorted BS. It's actually a pitiful
sight -- a grown man, reduced to inane whining on Usenet while the rest of
the world continues to revolve, just not around him.

In other words you have no proof.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

Exactly right Dan .Right now there are two of us who know the truth, me and
jaun.
One of us is lying ,I can't prove a negative but he can prove (If he's telling
the truth) that I lost my kids in a custody trial it would be a matter of public
record.It would be simple to post that document. I know what and who he's
talking about ,same last name no relation. Same as if I would say that his kid
was fathered by a different man and offered no proof or said that because there
is another Jiminiz out there it must be his family. Sheesh what a joke and he
talks about credibility ,especially when he works for the least credible
publication out there.

See ya

Chuck RAH-15/1 ret

ChuckSlusarczyk wrote in message ...
One of us is lying ,I can't prove a negative but he can prove (If he's telling
the truth) that I lost my kids in a custody trial it would be a matter of public
record.It would be simple to post that document. I know what and who he's
talking about ,same last name no relation. Same as if I would say that his kid
was fathered by a different man and offered no proof or said that because there
is another Jiminiz out there it must be his family. Sheesh what a joke and he
talks about credibility ,especially when he works for the least credible
publication out there.

Hey Chuck, if'n we're googling for your relatives, are you related to
her:
http://www.jurgita.com/models-id14811.html

I figure you must be. Same last name, same profession (you having
proved you were really a tshirt model)...

don't be shy, 'fess up

Sydney

And make sure you have proof of your relationship.

She's only 15. What's the age of consent in Ohio (or Poland)?

--
Bob (Chief Pilot, White Knuckle Airways)

I don't have to like Bush and Cheney (Or Kerry, for that matter) to love
America

"Snowbird" wrote in message
...


Hey Chuck, if'n we're googling for your relatives, are you related to
her:
http://www.jurgita.com/models-id14811.html

I figure you must be. Same last name, same profession (you having
proved you were really a tshirt model)...

don't be shy, 'fess up

Sydney

In article , Snowbird says...
Hey Chuck, if'n we're googling for your relatives, are you related to
her:
http://www.jurgita.com/models-id14811.html

I figure you must be. Same last name, same profession (you having
proved you were really a tshirt model)...

don't be shy, 'fess up

Sydney

OK OK Syd ya got me, she must be a relation.Same last name lives in Poland and
a beauty. Now if you single guys are nice to me I can introduce you to her
LOL!!!

Your right I was in fact a fashion model years ago (for 2 shoots) that was when
I was a "hunk" now I'm a "chunk" :-)

see ya

Chuck s