|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#21
November 8th 04, 09:47 PM
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 08 Nov 2004 19:30:24 GMT, Mike Rhodes
wrote: On Sat, 06 Nov 2004 22:22:22 GMT, Mike Rhodes wrote: Because the banked aircraft is aligned less with gravity, it would then want to accelerate 'up', as 'up' is relative to the aircraft. But this would immediately change the angle-of-attack of the both the wing and the horizontal stab. So the wing loses some lift, while the horizontal stab increases its already downward push. This would tend to push the nose 'up', and restore the angle of attack of the wing. Oops. I got this wrong. If both wing and horizontal stab are pushed down then the net effect is no change in angle of attack. --Mike 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| VOR/DME Approach Question | Chip Jones | Instrument Flight Rules | 47 | August 29th 04 06:03 AM |
| Phoenix AIM-54A (QUESTION) | Krztalizer | Naval Aviation | 10 | February 23rd 04 08:22 AM |
| Legal question - Pilot liability and possible involvement with a crime | John | Piloting | 5 | November 20th 03 10:40 PM |
| Question about Question 4488 | [email protected] | Instrument Flight Rules | 3 | October 27th 03 02:26 AM |
| Basic Stupid Newbie Questions... | John Penta | Military Aviation | 5 | September 19th 03 06:23 PM |
Threaded Mode