![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "C Kingsbury" wrote in message hlink.net... Roger, I find the conditions you describe (high wind velocity with low turbulence) more commonly in the Winter months up here in New England, which would seem to comport with your suspicions about atmospheric stability. Do you still have the winds and temperatures from that day? You could look at the lapse rate to see how it compared to the standard rate. -cwk. Stability is a great part of the equation, and there is one other. The High in the northeast is well established, to high levels. With Anticyclonic flow all the way up through 500 mb (18,000 ft) that airmass is generally sinking. Hence the clear skies, not even any CU, even though the air is relatively cold. Warm ground would help destabilize it, but the low sun-angle isn't doing very much. The horizontal gradient of the upper-air temperatures is fairly flat at all levels... At 5000 feet, it is only 6 degrees Celsius difference between Quebec and Northern Florida. A flat horizontal temperature gradient, actual leads to little vertical wind shear, and to some degree, to little *horizontal* wind shear.... So the only shear you tend to get is just the boundary-layer shear. So we have no vertical currents (stable), and little horizontal and vertical shear, (except for some vertical shear in the boundary layer). Now I am no aerodynamic expert, but it would seem that vertical wind shear (alone) is the least problematic for aircraft. With the horizontal wind changes quickly, the only things that happen could be yaw, and a possible change in overall lift, but there is little or no roll...the relative wind changes more or less uniformly for the whole wing. When we have those unstable summer CU days, and a similar sort of boundary layer vertical shear, the increased winds reach portions of the wings at different times due to the vertical currents helping to bring them down or retard them, (as well as adding their own differential vertical components...).... so the potential for roll is greatly increased. If you add horizontal shear, you get yaw problems as well. To summarize: A stable airmass with no horizontal shear, in spite of the boundary-layer vertical shear, is probably the cause of your non-problems. :-) Horizontal wind shear (such as vicinity of a front), and/or stronger sun producing convective currents, would have probably upset that significantly. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Two non-aviation questions | Ramapriya | Piloting | 12 | November 10th 04 12:51 AM |
An interesting experience | Ian MacLure | Military Aviation | 2 | May 18th 04 11:07 PM |
Showstoppers (long, but interesting questions raised) | Anonymous Spamless | Military Aviation | 0 | April 21st 04 05:09 AM |
Our experience at Sky Bryce ski resort (video) | John Harlow | Piloting | 1 | February 1st 04 01:57 PM |
Weathervaning | Koopas Ly | Piloting | 50 | November 15th 03 07:56 AM |