![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
About 6 months ago, I had to make a corporate decision as to whether to carry
Vertex/Yaesu or Icom handhelds in the product line. After a hell of a lot of work and research, I settled on Vertex. THe reasons would take me an hour to lay out, so I won't. Yaesu/Vertex is my choice. Jim "Jeff Franks" shared these priceless pearls of wisdom: -Just wondering if anyone here had experience (good or bad) with Vertex -handheld transceivers. I'm about to buy SOMETHING, but I'm not sure whether -or not I'm gonna stick with the standard ICOM. - -thanks for any opinions. - -jf - - Jim Weir (A&P/IA, CFI, & other good alphabet soup) VP Eng RST Pres. Cyberchapter EAA Tech. Counselor http://www.rst-engr.com |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jim Weir" wrote:
About 6 months ago, I had to make a corporate decision as to whether to carry Vertex/Yaesu or Icom handhelds in the product line. After a hell of a lot of work and research, I settled on Vertex. THe reasons would take me an hour to lay out, so I won't. Yaesu/Vertex is my choice. I like my Yaesu also, but mainly due to its compactness. But its compactness means a tiny speaker for less audio capability, and its almost "5W of peak envelope power" for transmit is misleading. A battered old Narco, brick-sized handheld I have (HT-8xx series, and with more battery power) has nice, loud audio, and though spec'd at minimum 1.5W of carrier transmit power, mine measures almost twice that on most of the band, and significantly more than the carrier power of the Yaesu. It's the one I prefer to toss in the airplane for backup, whereas the Yaesu is just fine for airport bumming to eavesdrop on communications and occasionally needling certain people on unicom. Fred F. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 18:11:12 -0800, Jim Weir wrote:
After a hell of a lot of work and research, I settled on Vertex. THe reasons would take me an hour to lay out, so I won't. I would one would appreciate hearing any of them that related to the units' performance, durability, etc (as opposed to business reasons). all the best -- Dan Ford email: (put Cubdriver in subject line) Warbird's Forum www.warbirdforum.com Piper Cub Forum www.pipercubforum.com the blog www.danford.net |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The nice thing about being on the engineering side of the house (as opposed to
the business side) is that my decisions are based on the quality and technical superiority of one product over another. Business reasons played very little in my decision. I considered the Vertex superior in terms of mechanical design and the resultant reliability. As was pointed out elsewhere, that chicken$#!t advertising 5 watts RF output (and then in small letters "PEP") isn't far from deceptive advertising, but that's the way some other companies are doing it and I guess to be competitive you have to play the game. Actually, you can't really go wrong with either Vertex or Icom. What I wish Vertex would do is come out with a permanent panel mount flatpack like the Icom and then I'd REALLY be happy. Jim Cub Driver shared these priceless pearls of wisdom: -On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 18:11:12 -0800, Jim Weir wrote: - -After a hell of a lot of -work and research, I settled on Vertex. THe reasons would take me an hour to -lay out, so I won't. - -I would one would appreciate hearing any of them that related to the -units' performance, durability, etc (as opposed to business reasons). Jim Weir (A&P/IA, CFI, & other good alphabet soup) VP Eng RST Pres. Cyberchapter EAA Tech. Counselor http://www.rst-engr.com |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim Weir wrote in message . ..
As was pointed out elsewhere, that chicken$#!t advertising 5 watts RF output (and then in small letters "PEP") isn't far from deceptive advertising, but that's the way some other companies are doing it and I guess to be competitive you have to play the game. I think it is deceptive. More than once I've heard somebody saying that they bought X handheld because it had a 5 watt transmitter. Several of the companies that sell handhelds are using the gimmick. Transmit power on most handhelds is about 1.5 watts. The funny part is that this is plenty of power for the task. You can transmit to the horizon from jet altitudes with 1.5 watts. When I used a handheld as a primary radio (1.5 watt w/ external antenna), I had no problem conversing clearly with Approach when I was 30 miles out. All in all, transmit power is not a big deal for aviation handhelds. John Galban=====N4BQ (PA28-180) |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You can transmit to the
horizon from jet altitudes with 1.5 watts. [...] ...transmit power is not a big deal for aviation handhelds. One of the uses of a handheld is to get weather, clearances and such on the ground in winter before starting the hobbs meter. I suspect that this is where the extra power comes in handy. Jose -- Freedom. It seemed like a good idea at the time. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Please stop me, Dear Lord, before I answer him in a tone unbecoming of a Thanksgiving weekend... {;-) Jim Jose shared these priceless pearls of wisdom: - -One of the uses of a handheld is to get weather, clearances and such on the ground in winter before starting the hobbs meter. I suspect that this is -where the extra power comes in handy. - -Jose Jim Weir (A&P/IA, CFI, & other good alphabet soup) VP Eng RST Pres. Cyberchapter EAA Tech. Counselor http://www.rst-engr.com |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
- One of the uses of a handheld is to get weather, clearances and such on the
- ground in winter before starting the hobbs meter. I suspect that this is - where the extra power comes in handy. Please stop me, Dear Lord, before I answer him in a tone unbecoming of a Thanksgiving weekend... Bearing in mind that the sites one might need to reach from the ground might not be located on the same field (in which case a tin can and a string would work), and there could be hills and such in the way, what is wrong with my thinking? Jose -- Freedom. It seemed like a good idea at the time. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim Weir wrote:
Please stop me, Dear Lord, before I answer him in a tone unbecoming of a Thanksgiving weekend... Wow, such restraint? An early New Year's resolution perhaps? Impressive! :-) -- Jack Allison PP-ASEL, soon-2-B-IA Student, airplane partnership student "When once you have tasted flight, you will forever walk the Earth with your eyes turned skyward, for there you have been, and there you will always long to return" - Leonardo Da Vinci (Remove the obvious from address to reply via e-mail) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
What's next for Garmin handhelds? NEW 296 | MichaelR | Piloting | 3 | March 19th 04 12:50 PM |
What's next for Garmin handhelds? | Mike Rapoport | Piloting | 13 | March 6th 04 03:58 PM |
CAD outline of Rans S6S instrument panel? | Rob Turk | Home Built | 2 | October 21st 03 09:27 PM |
Handhelds and alkaline batteries | Ross Richardson | Piloting | 44 | August 10th 03 12:17 AM |
Vertex Standard 700 opinions?? | EGWW | Owning | 3 | July 15th 03 01:43 PM |