![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#51
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Michael" wrote in message om... Here I think we fundamentally disagree. No judgment can be learned in the training environment, because nothing is at stake. I have extreme difficulty believing that anyone who actually does flight instruction could seriously say such a thing. |
#52
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "C J Campbell" writes: "Michael" wrote: Here I think we fundamentally disagree. No judgment can be learned in the training environment, because nothing is at stake. I have extreme difficulty believing that anyone who actually does flight instruction could seriously say such a thing. And yet there you have it. Michael uses an assertive style of making pronouncements that assumes an audience open-minded enough not to interpret them at their most straw-man shallow. The underlying point is of course something like this: when one is training, one's instructor or one's flight school sets many rules associated with e.g. weather. These rules, along with the presence of an instructor giving dual, conspire to provide such a margin of comfort that the student does not have to think that hard about go/no-go. She knows she will be overruled if the margin is being eaten into. Thus, a sense of responsibility for judgement in the student is not as well developed during training as afterward, when she actually makes binding unsupervised decisions, and has to live with the consequences. - FChE |
#53
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Frank Ch. Eigler" wrote in message
... And yet there you have it. Michael uses an assertive style of making pronouncements that assumes an audience open-minded enough not to interpret them at their most straw-man shallow. It's hard to interpret Michael's statement in any way other than how he said it. He didn't use ambiguous terminology. He said "*NO* judgment can be learned" and "*NOTHING* is at stake". That's just patently false. I would agree that the training environment does limit to some extent real-world situations that can produce a maturation of good judgment. But to say that no judgment can be learned in a training environment, and that nothing is at stake, is just plain stupid and an insult to all the instructors out there that manage to successfully teach good judgment as part of their curriculum. Pete |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Are pilots really good or just lucky??? | Icebound | Instrument Flight Rules | 68 | December 9th 04 01:53 PM |
Good Stories about Plane Purchases | Jon Kraus | Owning | 0 | August 11th 04 01:20 PM |
Good Source For PIREPS? | Phoenix Pilot | Instrument Flight Rules | 3 | August 25th 03 03:59 AM |
Commander gives Navy airframe plan good review | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | July 8th 03 09:10 PM |