|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
December 14th 04, 10:52 PM
|
|||
|
|||
"Michael" wrote in
I don't have a problem with this. However, the inevitable conclusion is that putting on a better show - one that draws a lot more spectators - justifies having more fatalities. Do you have some statistics that show that better shows are riskier shows? Different governments have different approaches to this. For example, Holland has a hard and fast rule - no aerobatics below 500 AGL, ever. Got a cite for this? No, it's not a good argument right here and now. Cutting expenditures has to start somewhere, and it's very hard to argue that entertainment is a bad place to start. It's a bad place to start. "Entertainment" expenditures often bring in more revenue benefits than other types of spending. Or do you object for ethical reasons? le m 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
