![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm not saying that. Just like I'm not saying there aren't VOR
approaches where the missed is based on having a working VOR. But VOR receivers cash it in, as well. Don't recall seeing any, but there may be some NDB approaches where the missed is based only on the NDB; I don't shoot many of those any more. Plenty of planes have a single GPS receiver...my response was about the similarlity between losing the entire GPS system, and having your pretty new Garmin 430 go 'pzzzzt!' and dark halfway into a GPS approach. In both cases, you lack the ability to fly the published missed if the missed is solely based on the GPS. So what? We aren't robots...we're pilots. We think our way through things. If we're talking to approach or tower, we tell them we lost the GPS and we need vectors for the missed and a different approach. If we're not talking to anyone, then we do what we can...does the airport have a VOR approach as well? Well, given the spacing requirements between IFR traffic, then we fly *that* missed, maybe. I try to tell my students that one cannot prepare for *every* possibility. That's one reason they have to *understand* what's going on as they are doing something...not just be able to perform it by rote. The probability of losing the entire GPS system is so low that it doesn't even register on my radar. And the probability that I happen to be on a GPS approach (in actual), not talking to ATC, on an approach that has a missed procedure solely based on the GPS when they shut it down? Probability quickly fading towards infinitely small...and if it does somehow manage to happen? I'll find a way to deal with it, as would you, and every other qualified pilot out there. Cheers, Cap Larry Dighera wrote: On 16 Dec 2004 12:40:02 -0800, wrote in .com:: Larry Dighera wrote: On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 14:08:48 -0500, "Chris Gumm" wrote in :: http://cnn.netscape.cnn.com/ns/news/...&w=APO&coview= Mo http://q1.schwab.com/s/r?l=248&a=103...a&s=rb041 215 ================================================== ============== This begs the question, what do you do if you're on a GPS approach when they shut the system down? You mean other than go missed and shoot something else? Kind of similar to what you'd do if your GPS went South on you in the middle of an approach? ![]() Cap So, you're saying there are no GPS approaches whose missed approach procedures rely upon GPS? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
American nazi pond scum, version two | bushite kills bushite | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 21st 04 10:46 PM |
Hey! What fun!! Let's let them kill ourselves!!! | [email protected] | Naval Aviation | 2 | December 17th 04 09:45 PM |
bush rules! | Be Kind | Military Aviation | 53 | February 14th 04 04:26 PM |
God Honest | Naval Aviation | 2 | July 24th 03 04:45 AM |