![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
One of the dynamics of purchasing cheaper headsets (or many other things in
life) is that a cheap headset doesn't necessarily mean you'll have problems - but it increases the chances of getting one that will have problems. High and Low quality items (say Bose -v- Lightspeed) are marketed with differing dynamics. Bose will use more expensive parts and put more into R & D - but it probably still doesn't cost them more than $50 per unit (not counting R & D). Yes, they make a high margin, but that will be offset by the fact that they don't sell as many of them. You'll probably find it only costs $20 to make a Lightspeed headset - they still make a large margin - and they sell many more because of the price - but profits are reduced by the cost of the customer service. And the resulting reputation sets their place in the market. Two manufacturers taking two differing approaches to their marketing. I'm always guided by the old saying "The memories of poor quality remain far longer than those of the low price." "PJ Hunt" wrote in message ... Thomas, Well, mine are in their 7th year and going strong. I'm happy for you. However you don't offer any comparison to the type of use and abuse that your headsets must withstand in reference to what I posted about the headsets I use. I have a cheap pair of 69 dollar Sigtronics that I got in the early 90's that still look and work like new. That's because there in a closet never being used. My point was specifically about how abused headsets get in a 'professional' environment and I've been thru and seen many used by other operators, and the DC consistently out perform the others for durability. As I posted originally, if you or your passengers don't subject your headsets to that kind of abuse, then you would probably be very happy with some other brand. Did the owner ask Lightspeed about repairs? Did they charge him? Didn't think so. You thought wrong. The owner(s) did contact Lightspeed and were told they were not under warranty and the cost to repair them was well into the price of new headsets. As a matter of fact when I made reference to my girlfriends set, (of headsets) I realized I was mistaken. They were not two years old, but only one year. She received them as a Christmas gift and they were broken by October. They spent the majority of their time in her flight bag. I like the Lightspeeds for comfort and audio quality, but as I said, my experience has been they don't use the best materials in the manufacturing process. As for the Boise, they're much better made and with better quality materials then the Lightspeed, but the darn mic keeps getting sloppy on so many models. I realize that I fly many more hours a year than most people, and because of this and the type of environments I fly in and out of, me and my customers are much harder on headsets than most people, but I just don't have any of these issues with the Dave Clarks. PJ ============================================ Here's to the duck who swam a lake and never lost a feather, May sometime another year, we all be back together. JJW ============================================ |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cockpit Colin wrote:
..... Bose will use more expensive parts and put more into R & D - but it probably still doesn't cost them more than $50 per unit (not counting R & D). Yes, they make a high margin, but that will be offset by the fact that they don't sell as many of them. I have no clue whatsoever what it costs Lightspeed to manufacture their headsets. However, having worked on the Bose X as a mechanical engineer as they were being designed and released to manufacturing, I've got a VERY good idea what the manufacturing costs of the Bose X are, and it's nowhere NEAR $50. When they were released in early 1999, the manufacturing cost (including amortization of tooling, which was to run three years), was about $320/unit. Amortization of tooling was about $30/unit. I would have to assume that in the intervening 5 years there's been some cost reduction effort, but I'd be VERY surprised, given how little the design has changes, if the manufacturing cost is below $250/unit at this point. And no, I no longer work there and get headsets cheap :-). -- Marc J. Zeitlin http://marc.zeitlin.home.comcast.net/ http://www.cozybuilders.org/ Copyright (c) 2004 |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ahhh - so we blame you for the hot spot on the early models!
![]() I was referring more to the concept - I took a wild stab at the price (which was clearly way out) (actually, having just had to defend someone over a similar thing I should have known better!) - should have kept prices out of it in retrospect. I guess it comes down to the age-old-saying "you get what you pay for". "Marc J. Zeitlin" wrote in message news:PpOwd.589967$D%.177216@attbi_s51... Cockpit Colin wrote: ..... Bose will use more expensive parts and put more into R & D - but it probably still doesn't cost them more than $50 per unit (not counting R & D). Yes, they make a high margin, but that will be offset by the fact that they don't sell as many of them. I have no clue whatsoever what it costs Lightspeed to manufacture their headsets. However, having worked on the Bose X as a mechanical engineer as they were being designed and released to manufacturing, I've got a VERY good idea what the manufacturing costs of the Bose X are, and it's nowhere NEAR $50. When they were released in early 1999, the manufacturing cost (including amortization of tooling, which was to run three years), was about $320/unit. Amortization of tooling was about $30/unit. I would have to assume that in the intervening 5 years there's been some cost reduction effort, but I'd be VERY surprised, given how little the design has changes, if the manufacturing cost is below $250/unit at this point. And no, I no longer work there and get headsets cheap :-). -- Marc J. Zeitlin http://marc.zeitlin.home.comcast.net/ http://www.cozybuilders.org/ Copyright (c) 2004 |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cockpit Colin wrote:
Ahhh - so we blame you for the hot spot on the early models! ![]() No, no, no :-). I got there about 6 months before release, so the DESIGN was already fixed. The only stuff that I got to work on was the stuff that just absolutely didn't work, and manufacturing stuff (so that we could actually build and sell them - what a concept :-) ). I only fixed stuff - I never broke it :-). As an aside, the Bose I and Bose II series headsets never made money - they never even broke even. The Series X is a good moneymaker for Bose. I guess it comes down to the age-old-saying "you get what you pay for". Well, sort of. Bose is, how shall we say, not the most cost effective company from an overhead standpoint. I have no doubt that in a company that had better control of overhead, and better manufacturing/materials control, the ~$300/unit could have been brought down to $200/unit, but it's not going to get much cheaper than that with the current design. Magnesium headbands and aluminum staples, along with very high quality microphones and connectors cost $$$..... -- Marc J. Zeitlin http://marc.zeitlin.home.comcast.net/ http://www.cozybuilders.org/ Copyright (c) 2004 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Taking my wife up for the first time | Marco Rispoli | Piloting | 30 | May 25th 04 07:34 PM |
Bose makes good on my wife's headset. | Kyler Laird | General Aviation | 3 | March 10th 04 02:08 PM |
Bose makes good on my wife's headset. | Kyler Laird | Piloting | 3 | March 10th 04 02:08 PM |
Wife agrees to go flying | Corky Scott | Piloting | 29 | October 2nd 03 06:55 PM |
First flight with my wife! (long) | Wily Wapiti | Piloting | 8 | August 30th 03 05:57 PM |