![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "PJ Hunt" wrote in message ... Jim, I don't fly Ultralights or motorized paragliders, but I can read and I see no where under §103.15 where it says, QUOTE Add that this quote is ignored, as long as you leave yourself a landing spot incase/when your engine quits. END QUOTE Where are you getting this? PJ Uh, watching them fly over my house, which is in city limits, for one. -- Jim in NC |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Morgans wrote: Uh, watching them fly over my house, which is in city limits, for one. Is it in a "congested area" of the city? George Patterson The desire for safety stands against every great and noble enterprise. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "G.R. Patterson III" wrote Is it in a "congested area" of the city? George Patterson The desire for safety stands against every great and noble enterprise. Define congested. Therein is the rub. Regulations for homebuilts, at one time, did not allow flight over congested areas. After a period of time, no one cared when they flew anywhere they wanted. The regs were changed, as I recall, with a ruling, rather than a re-write. Seems to me the same condition exists with ultralights. Stay above 500 ft, or high enough to stretch a glide to an area where an emergency landing is possible and safe, and nothing will be said. Can anyone cite examples of people being told not to fly somewhere? (other than controlled airspace) -- Jim in NC |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ok, sorry for the confusion. When you responded to a quoted reg, it appeared
that you were implying there was more to the reg than the rest of us were seeing. Now I understand you were simply stating what you had been observing, although as I'm sure you know, seeing someone do something by no means implies it's right or even legal under the regs. You're absolutely correct about the congested area issue. This ambiguity is the exact problem I have with many of the regs. There's too much room for personal interpretation and depending on who you talk to or who you **** off, you'll get a different interpretation on any given day. I would take a guess though that if it's in the city limits as you stated, that would probably be interpreted by the FAA as a congested area, but of course dealing with the FAA, I would NOT be willing to bet any money on it. And then of course even if you don't violate any regs at all, and something still goes wrong, you may well be facing the good ole catch all "91.13: Careless and Reckless". It's kind of like the FAA's trump card. Their Ace in the Hole. You also made a question in your post to GR Patterson; Can anyone cite examples of people being told not to fly somewhere? (other than controlled airspace) I'm not sure I understand your question, but 91.119 applies to all aircraft in all airspace, including uncontrolled. Another example is the "REQUEST" that pilots remain above 2000 feet (1000 in some cases) in many areas such as National Parks, Wildlife Reserves, Bird Areas, Wilderness Areas etc etc. This is noted by the dashed blue line on sectional charts. Many if not most of these areas or only Class G. Many any people think this is a Reg, but it is only a request and not regulated. In Denali National Park where I have flown for many years, there has been talk between the NPS and FAA for the last few years to close certain areas of the park to aircraft. Denali is all Class G (uncontrolled) below class E. I'm sure if I gave it enough thought I could probably come up with a few more examples, as well as other people here also. Then again maybe I just completely misunderstood your question and I"m going off in the wrong direction. PJ ============================================ Here's to the duck who swam a lake and never lost a feather, May sometime another year, we all be back together. JJW ============================================ ----- Original Message ----- From: "Morgans" Newsgroups: rec.aviation.piloting Sent: Monday, December 20, 2004 2:57 AM Subject: motorized paraglyders "PJ Hunt" wrote in message ... Jim, I don't fly Ultralights or motorized paragliders, but I can read and I see no where under §103.15 where it says, QUOTE Add that this quote is ignored, as long as you leave yourself a landing spot incase/when your engine quits. END QUOTE Where are you getting this? PJ Uh, watching them fly over my house, which is in city limits, for one. -- Jim in NC |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
T-hangar's bi-fold door: Convert to a motorized opening door? | Peter R. | Piloting | 16 | August 21st 04 01:06 AM |