![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hilton wrote:
[...] I've been following this accident closely because he took off from my home airport, I am *very* familiar with route, I took note of the weather that day when I heard about the accident, I watched the aircraft fly along Hwy 101 around (usually below) 1000' MSL for about 30 miles (on SJC's RADAR), and the 'fire' story added mystery. It's very sad that a pilot lost his life and the question that remains to be answered is why no IFR clearance out of RHV? Plane not IFR capable (at the time), pilots not current, a delay getting out of RHV, something else? A few years ago weather fooled me to fly across these hills toward Hollister. I was coming from the opposite direction, flying home to SJC. In the Central Valley sky was overcast, but at higher elevation, 10-12 thousand feet if I recall it correctly, so I maintained my altitude without a problem. As I was close to Panoche I saw that the clouds over the hills were darker, however I could see the sun patches on the Ocean from beneath them. I saw no high buildup and I estimated the height of this layer to be approx. 1000' at max. I saw a jet descending between this low layer and the high elevation overcast. I listened to Hollister traffic, many people were flying over there, and so I attempted to cross toward Hollister/Gilroy. That was a mistake. As I entered the valley close to Panoche VOR, in just a few minutes the ceiling became literally closing on me. The air became violent and I decided that its enough of the foolishness with this "somehow scraping the ceiling and going home anyway." I made a 180. But behind me clouds were also already so low that I could not see the sides of the pass. I went into a climb and I was forced to enter IMC conditions for at least a half of this turn before I was atop of the cloud layer. I flew back toward Harris Ranch and I stayed there overnight. So I got my big scare and I was astonished and angry about myself that I brought myself into such risky situation. During the entire evening, while enjoying an opulent dinner at Harris Ranch, I tried to understand and to summarize my mistakes. My top list is: a) I called Flight Watch as I passed Tehachapi Pass and I saw that weather was completely different on this side of the Sierras. They warned against attempting to fly VFR further than to Fresno. My personal assessment of the high ceiling and the presence of sunny patches seduced me to ignore their expertise and to push it too far. This was probably the classic "I wanna reach my destination" syndrome. b) Never try to enter passes or otherwise fly over hills with a low ceiling over them, especially if the due point is close to the temperature. Clear passage might be only an optical illusion, moist air might turn into clouds in a matter of minutes. c) You/me/us are not more clever that *them*. If *their* brains failed to properly assess a possible danger, you can do the same kind of mistake and possibly make one more entry in the NTSB statistics. Thus stay away from marginal situations. While reading this NTSB report I wonder if the pilots of the Commander have also underestimated the speed in which visibility might deteriorate under such conditions, and that's why they did not bothered to obtain IFR clearance on takeoff from RHV. Thomas Anyway, just thought I'd update the group. Hilton |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
a) I called Flight Watch as I passed Tehachapi Pass and I saw that
weather was completely different on this side of the Sierras. They warned against attempting to fly VFR further than to Fresno. My personal assessment of the high ceiling and the presence of sunny patches seduced me to ignore their expertise and to push it too far. This was probably the classic "I wanna reach my destination" syndrome. It's also the classic "They always say "VFR not reccomended". I've learned not to pay attention to that kind of disclaimer because it's so overused it's meaningless, and doesn't seem to represent "their expertise" so much as "their lawyers". Sometimes they're right, but you can't tell from that statement when it will be. You need to interpret the rest of what they are saying, and then, aren't you making your own personal assessment anyway? Jose -- Money: What you need when you run out of brains. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
molding plexiglas websites? | [email protected] | Owning | 44 | February 17th 05 09:33 PM |
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons | Curtl33 | General Aviation | 7 | January 9th 04 11:35 PM |
PC flight simulators | Bjørnar Bolsøy | Military Aviation | 178 | December 14th 03 12:14 PM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |