![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
jharper aaatttt cisco dddooottt com wrote:
Dean Wilkinson wrote: Visit this website and it will answer your questions about the relationship between pressure, temperature and altitude... altimeters are designed to take the non-linearity into account... http://www.lerc.nasa.gov/WWW/K-12/airplane/atmosi.html Nice site, thanks. But presumably there is some standard atmospheric model that altimeters use? After all nobody actually cares whether FL300 is really 30000' feet above MSL, as long as everyone flying there is at the same altitude and, more importantly, not at somebody else's FL290 or FL310. Yes, there is a standard model and if you click on the first link on the cited page you get to: http://www.lerc.nasa.gov/WWW/K-12/airplane/atmos.html which gives the equations describing that standard model. Which implies that there must be some standard mechanical way of making the translation? There's a mathematically defined correspondence between altitude and pressure under the standard atmosphere assumption. But I doubt if the specific mechanical means of achieving that correspondence is specified anywhere. As long as the manufacturer makes an instrument that is shown to give the right correspondence to within a specified accuracy why should it matter exactly how they do it? I'll ask next time I visit my avionics shop, but considering what each visit costs I quite hope this won't be for a while. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|