![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Jay Honeck wrote: I finally got some time to put this one up on our site. See it at http://www.alexisparkinn.com/photoga...ash_1-2005.mpg It looked like the pilot originally tried to set up for the golf course and then opted to try for the road at the last minute when they saw the golfer on the field. They appeared to be much too high to make the golf course however. Once they turned towards the road on the left, the pilot may have suddenly realized that he was going to overshoot the centerline of the road and made some small corrections to the right to compensate for the drift to the left. It did look like he had everything under control before disappearing behind a set of trees. Once the plane was behind the trees, the bottom of the left wing settled down on top of a power line running along side of the road. You can see the power lines sag down before the plane reappears from behind the trees. Since the left wing was now riding on top of the power line, the continuing descent set the plane on a knife edge, shearing off parts of the right wing as it struck the ground and unfortunately guided the cockpit straight into the utility pole. The video seems to also show that he was able to clear the truck if he had made it to the road. A quick look on terraserver NW of Orlando Executive revealed this golf course that looks like the site they were aiming for: http://terraserver.microsoft.com/ima...rlando%7cfl%7c What a tragedy this is. It looked like they had a real shot of a successful forced landing. Since most of my flying is over densely populated areas, I have to wonder how I would've reacted if I were in their shoes at the time. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "pnw_aviator" wrote in message ups.com... Here is the NTSB prelim report: http://www.ntsb.gov/ntsb/brief.asp?e...13X00046&key=1 You know, hindsight is always 20-20, but if they lost oil pressure and still had a running engine, why didn't they try to land anywhere they could right now with what engine they had left rather that trying to nurse it to get to the airport? I'm not sure what I would do now that I think of it; I would have to watch the other engine instruments to see if the CHT was going high (if it was installed) thus confirming oil loss. Maybe need to make a decision right here right now, on the ground, that if I see low or zero pressure I will land immediately... |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 01:52:10 GMT, "Blueskies"
wrote: "pnw_aviator" wrote in message ups.com... Here is the NTSB prelim report: http://www.ntsb.gov/ntsb/brief.asp?e...13X00046&key=1 You know, hindsight is always 20-20, but if they lost oil pressure and still had a running engine, why didn't they try to land anywhere they could right now with what engine they had left rather that trying to nurse it to get to the airport? I'm not sure what I would do now that I think of it; I would have to watch the other engine instruments to see if the CHT was going high (if it was installed) thus confirming oil loss. Maybe need to make a decision right here right now, on the ground, that if I see low or zero pressure I will land immediately... Without knowing all the facts of what the engine was sounding like, what their oil temp was reading, and other gauges (if they had other gauges) were reading, I too would have gone for the airport, it was only 8 miles out. Why risk a dangerous off airport landing in a highly populated area for what could be a bad gauge. I too have had to make that same decision a few years ago with a gas gauge. In a twin, I was making a flight that was 3.5 hours long with full tanks that have a 5.5 hour endurance. Just before I was to arrive at my destination about 10 min, I noticed that the right tank was showing near empty with my left tank showing 20+ gallons remaining (which was where it should have been). I had myself convinced it was a gauge. I was IMC at night, by myself and in icing conditions, on my final vector to intercept the LOC when my right engine died. After the "OH ****" thought went through my mind, I hit the cross feed, continued on with the approach, after what felt like 30min's (of course it was only probably a few seconds) the engine sprang back to life and I continued into the airport and landed safely. The next day, I had the thing checked out and found out that I had a ruptured fuel bladder. Because it was dark and IMC, I couldn't see the fuel leaking out. Its really hard to say "I would have" without being in the cockpit and seeing what the pilot is seeing and hearing and interpreting. My .02 Scott D To email remove spamcatcher |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Blueskies" wrote in
You know, hindsight is always 20-20, but if they lost oil pressure and still had a running engine, why didn't they try to land anywhere they could right now with what engine they had left rather that trying to nurse it to get to the airport? I'm not sure what I would do now that I think of it; I would have to watch the other engine instruments to see if the CHT was going high (if it was installed) thus confirming oil loss. Maybe need to make a decision right here right now, on the ground, that if I see low or zero pressure I will land immediately... IIRC, on the Cessna Lycoming, the Gauge and the Idiot Light are separate circuits. If one or the other remains in the Oil Pressure OK state, and the temps don't rise, you have oil pressure. If they both indicate oil pressure loss, it is over. Unless you need to travel some distance (over water, perhaps) perform a forced approach. Don't rely on the fan for anything. The video shows him way too high and fast for the fairway. And, if I read the Terraserver image correctly, that was his only option at that point. moo |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Happy Dog" wrote in message .. . "Blueskies" wrote in You know, hindsight is always 20-20, but if they lost oil pressure and still had a running engine, why didn't they try to land anywhere they could right now with what engine they had left rather that trying to nurse it to get to the airport? I'm not sure what I would do now that I think of it; I would have to watch the other engine instruments to see if the CHT was going high (if it was installed) thus confirming oil loss. Maybe need to make a decision right here right now, on the ground, that if I see low or zero pressure I will land immediately... IIRC, on the Cessna Lycoming, the Gauge and the Idiot Light are separate circuits. If one or the other remains in the Oil Pressure OK state, and the temps don't rise, you have oil pressure. If they both indicate oil pressure loss, it is over. Unless you need to travel some distance (over water, perhaps) perform a forced approach. Don't rely on the fan for anything. The video shows him way too high and fast for the fairway. And, if I read the Terraserver image correctly, that was his only option at that point. moo It looks like they had almost 8 minutes from the time they reported loss of oil pressure to the time they crashed. They had about 5 minutes from the time they reported loss of pressure to the time they reported the engine failed. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Blueskies"
IIRC, on the Cessna Lycoming, the Gauge and the Idiot Light are separate circuits. If one or the other remains in the Oil Pressure OK state, and the temps don't rise, you have oil pressure. If they both indicate oil pressure loss, it is over. Unless you need to travel some distance (over water, perhaps) perform a forced approach. Don't rely on the fan for anything. The video shows him way too high and fast for the fairway. And, if I read the Terraserver image correctly, that was his only option at that point. It looks like they had almost 8 minutes from the time they reported loss of oil pressure to the time they crashed. They had about 5 minutes from the time they reported loss of pressure to the time they reported the engine failed. I meant the only option at the point the video begins. I may be missing some information. But the road was a terrible choice and I don't see any other option but the fairway in his final flight path. And, depending on a few extra minutes to get to a getter landing site isn't always wise. The engine can fail unpredictably. If you're over wide open farmland, you might as head for the longest flattest field and hope you make it. There's usually lots of options underneath you all the time. Otherwise, pick a spot and start the drill. moo |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
C172 Plane crash Orlando, FL | CFLav8r | Piloting | 25 | January 15th 05 08:54 PM |
HARRIER CRASH - video | Don Tuite | Owning | 0 | October 25th 04 10:08 PM |
CRASH: Harrier down (video included) | Maule Driver | Piloting | 3 | October 23rd 04 09:23 AM |
Video link - no crash | zatatime | Piloting | 4 | October 19th 04 04:10 PM |
Helicopter crash video | James Blakely | Piloting | 17 | December 30th 03 03:21 PM |