![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If you used 35mm...and if you hve the desire to follow up...there was a
situation here in Seattle where a homeowner had snapped a 35mm picture of a "low flying" airplane. One of the more technically astute ops inspectors measured the wingspan on the slide, did the necessary math, and proved that the plane was legal. Bob Gardner wrote in message oups.com... I was shopping at a Wal-Mart on December 17, 2004, when I noticed outside a helicopter flying just over the tops of the parked vehicles in front of the store. It was flying towards me, about 20 feet above the ground and climbing. I got a photograph of it when it was about 50 to 70 feet in the air. It quickly flew up past me and over the top of the building. I realize that helicopters have a lot of flight freedom, but it is still shocking to see one flying directly towards oneself like this. Coincidentally, an assistant manager at that store told me last week that I was not allowed to bring my camera inside the store. He cited security risk, and made a vague reference to the cameras they sell in the Electronics Department. So, it may be difficult to get photos like the one I took, at least from that store. http://members.aol.com/rekgallery/WM_Heli/WM_Heli.html |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"If you used 35mm..."
No, it was a digital camera. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Not that it's immediately relevant to the subject, but you may find it
amusing. I had a friend who once brought a film camera into a Frys Electronics (growing chain, mostly west coast I think) and went through the motions of taking a picture. A security guard said he'd have to confiscate the film, and my friend objected, saying that he had lots of shots on there he didn't want to lose. Frys then developed the film for him with the understanding that they would remove any shots of the inside of the store. Humorously, the film had already been fully exposed by the time this happened, so they ended up developing the film for him gratis, and he received the prints and negatives intact. He felt that he found a creative way to thumb his nose at their 'No photos' policy. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"He felt that he found a creative way to thumb his nose
at their 'No photos' policy." How nefarious! I took a photo inside a Fry's Electronics store, back when I did not know they had a policy against it. I soon found out, as someone walked up to me and told me it wasn't allowed. No one tried to get the single photo I had taken, though, and I still have it. But, see, Fry's lets people take cameras inside their store. I have to get a yellow slip with the serial number filled out before I go into the main part of the store, but they have never given me any trouble about carrying a camera around inside the store. Most merchants don't give me any trouble for it. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Lockheed wins Presidential helicopter contract | Tiger | Naval Aviation | 0 | January 29th 05 05:24 AM |
Dennis Fetters Mini 500 | EmailMe | Home Built | 70 | June 21st 04 09:36 PM |
Musings of a Commercial Helicopter Pilot | Badwater Bill | Home Built | 6 | February 27th 04 09:11 AM |
Helicopter crash video | James Blakely | Piloting | 17 | December 30th 03 03:21 PM |
After 23 years, Marines get last Super Stallion CH-53E helicopter | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | November 25th 03 10:04 PM |