A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

"Wind 285 at 186"



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 13th 05, 11:50 PM
Morgans
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Kyle Boatright" wrote

Taking Kennesaw "Mountain" and Stone "Mountain" out of the equation, you
need to get pretty far North in Georgia (75 miles from Atlanta, at least)

to
find anything more than 500' hills...

I'd guess wind shear was the source of any turbulence.

KB

It was my understanding that you could get standing waves that could go for
100 miles, or more. Wrong?
--
Jim in NC


  #2  
Old February 14th 05, 12:15 AM
Mike Rapoport
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Morgans" wrote in message
...

"Kyle Boatright" wrote

Taking Kennesaw "Mountain" and Stone "Mountain" out of the equation, you
need to get pretty far North in Georgia (75 miles from Atlanta, at least)

to
find anything more than 500' hills...

I'd guess wind shear was the source of any turbulence.

KB

It was my understanding that you could get standing waves that could go
for
100 miles, or more. Wrong?
--
Jim in NC


True (even farther, but the amplitude decreases as you go farther downwind.
The rotor is at ridge level. There can also be a lot of wave turbulence at
the tropopause but that would be above 310. Turbulence in the middle flight
levels is usually shear unrelated to mountain waves. The mid flight levels
are in the laminar portion of mountain waves and it is amazingly smooth
there.

Mike
MU-2


  #3  
Old February 14th 05, 03:14 AM
Kyle Boatright
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Morgans" wrote in message
...

"Kyle Boatright" wrote

Taking Kennesaw "Mountain" and Stone "Mountain" out of the equation, you
need to get pretty far North in Georgia (75 miles from Atlanta, at least)

to
find anything more than 500' hills...

I'd guess wind shear was the source of any turbulence.

KB

It was my understanding that you could get standing waves that could go
for
100 miles, or more. Wrong?
--
Jim in NC


No doubt about that, but the real mountains in Georgia are pretty far North
and/or Northeast. Since wind from 285 close to due West, I woudn't think
anything more or less West of Atlanta would cause standing waves anywhere
near the city..

Of course, all of this goes back to what the original poster considered to
be "Near Atlanta"..

KB


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Interesting wind experience Roger Long Piloting 3 November 15th 04 05:34 PM
Airspeed Indication and Relative Wind Scott Lowrey Piloting 24 May 8th 04 08:20 PM
Amazing Wind Shear Today Jay Honeck Piloting 25 December 3rd 03 10:23 PM
Wind deflectors on balloon? Roy Smith General Aviation 1 September 2nd 03 03:52 AM
Wind Turbines and stealth Arved Sandstrom Military Aviation 6 August 8th 03 10:30 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.