A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Rotorcraft
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

TFR not right IMO



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 2nd 03, 07:36 PM
Malcolm Teas
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Ron Natalie" wrote in message om...
"Greg Burkhart (MN)" wrote in message news:NlCMa.18347$926.145@sccrnsc03...
"Malcolm Teas" wrote in message
om...
Agreed. Welcome to the club folks. Here in the Washington DC area we
have:

1) A permanent TFR centered around National Airport.


A permanent TFR? Would it still be a TFR???


They stopped calling it a TFR. It's a "Flight Restricted Zone."


I wonder how it will be marked on the new sectional in August? I'm
wondering if it'll be the blue hached edge of a Restricted area. But,
that's probably too honest a portrayal.

I also think it's weird how the western edge of the flight restricted
zone has a funny angle in it. That's from the isogonic line that it
was originally drawn with reference to. Of course the isogonic's
moved since that chart came out. It shows the general cluelessness
going on.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:03 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.