![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
I don't think you have this quite right, but I am certainly no expert.
As I understand it neither pilot can fly under sport pilot if they know that their condition is an impairment to safe operation. Now, the experienced pilot who lost his medical certainly knows this (at least knows that it is the FAA's opinion), and there is proof. The new pilot may either not know this, or "elect" to not know this, and the worst he will likely suffer bureaucratically is losing his new privileges. The fact that he is at risk for real problems is another discussion. I suspect that before too long the FAA will publish a laundry list for the sport pilots to help them police themselves. So if you are upset about the loophole and its potential to penalize the formerly certidfied pilot, rest assured, the loophole will likely close. Also, try to put on the hat of the bureaucrat. They have all decided that it is unsafe for people with a list of conditions to fly. If they were to suddenly turn around and so it is safe for them to fly, just in sport planes, then what are they going to say when a pedestrian gets killed by a sport plane piloted by a guy who formerly lost his medical? Their number one priority is keeping their job long enough to get their pension, and this sort of thing could keep that from happening. Now, you also threw out some frustration over whether the condition you mention should be considered a problem or not. I feel your pain, but you have to know that the bureaucrat will choose the CYA answer everytime. The only solution is to get all the folks on this drug together, and lobby for a change. Numbers are the answer. "frustrated flier" wrote in message m... I am unclear on two Sport Pilot issues: First, a new pilot may qualify for a Sport Pilot ticket even though he or she takes a medication that would preclude a 3rd class medical. However, an experienced pilot with a higher ticket may not operate as a Sport Pilot if he lost a medical last year for taking the same medication. In other words, both pilots have exactly the same medical history: One is allowed to fly as a Sport Pilot and the other is not. For the second issue, let's assume the medication is an SSRI where the preponderance of medical opinion is that the medication does not impair a pilot and makes them less of a risk if they need it. This is the same medication that has been commonly prescribed to combat Navy carrier pilots and Canadian fliers for years without issues. The same medication that was prescribed for the ATP who will fly your family home for Christmas but he cannot take it out of fear of losing his medical. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 03:26 PM |
| sport pilot humor | Occom | Home Built | 0 | April 9th 04 05:22 PM |
| Sport Pilot Leaves DOT for OMB, Latest News | Fitzair4 | Home Built | 3 | December 25th 03 03:49 AM |
| New Sport Pilot Aircraft Website | Info | Home Built | 0 | November 29th 03 11:25 AM |
| Sport Pilot Seminar & Fly-in | Gilan | Home Built | 0 | October 11th 03 06:21 AM |