![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
sanman wrote:
Here's something I was reading: http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99996380 So beyond the mere claim of being more efficient, why would it actually be so? The claim of hovering for 4 days is quite a jump, when compared to Global Hawk. Is this even vaguely realistic? Don't know, but you can buy a controllable model helicopter that operates kind of on this principle. One plus is that you don't waste any BTUs countering the rotation with a tail rotor or similar. http://www.hobbylinc.com/htm/snh/snh36859.htm My son has one, and it's a blast to fly. i let him have the controls occasionally. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
CNO wants more skilled, efficient Navy workforce | Otis Willie | Naval Aviation | 0 | January 5th 05 11:05 PM |
The "Whirl": More Efficient Rotary Craft? | sanman | Home Built | 5 | September 10th 04 04:11 PM |
Proposals for air breathing hypersonic craft. I | Robert Clark | Military Aviation | 2 | May 26th 04 06:42 PM |
Vril 7 at Arado Brandedburg '44/'45 | robert arndt | Military Aviation | 31 | November 17th 03 11:06 PM |