BOHICA! Weiner's Bill to Restrict GA

Bush's attempts to legislate morality.

Oh? I suppose you could suggest what some of these attempts were?

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/relea...0040224-2.html

"John Harlow" wrote in message
...

Bush's attempts to legislate morality.

Oh? I suppose you could suggest what some of these attempts were?

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/relea...0040224-2.html

How is that an attempt to legislate morality?

"John Harlow" wrote in message
...

Bush's attempts to legislate morality.

Oh? I suppose you could suggest what some of these attempts were?

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/relea...0040224-2.html

This appears to be an attempt to prevent others from legislating morality,
or simply imposing their version of morality from the judicial bench.

C J Campbell wrote:
"John Harlow" wrote in message
...

Bush's attempts to legislate morality.

Oh? I suppose you could suggest what some of these attempts were?

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/relea...0040224-2.html

This appears to be an attempt to prevent others from legislating
morality, or simply imposing their version of morality from the
judicial bench.


No, it is a desire to control an individual's choice as to who they can
marry. It's none of Bush's damn business who I, you or anybody else choose
to marry.

This is but one example. From
http://www.findarticles.com/p/articl...62/ai_86048070

"In a related matter, the Bush administration proposed on February 26 a
total global ban on all experimentation in the field of cloning. Making no
distinction between therapeutic and reproductive research, the
administration's position has caused outrage among scientists. A
spokesperson for the American Society for Reproductive Medicine declared,
"It's bad enough that the administration would seek to impose its views on
the American people, let alone the entire world."
Bush has also asked for legislation that would pour millions of federal
dollars into abstinence-only education and efforts to encourage single
mothers to marry regardless of the circumstances--maneuvers which would have
his personal sectarian views on morality established into civic law. In his
State of the Union address, he expressed pride in the liberation of women in
Afghanistan; however, by announcing these initiatives, he hypocritically is
attempting to limit women's rights at home.

And these aren't Bush's only forays into the realm of public morality. His
administration previously challenged assisted suicide, put a hold on
international family planning funding, tried to remove birth control
coverage from federal employees' insurance plans, restricted stem cell
research, ended the Labor Department's "Equal Pay Matters" program, skipped
the international conference on racism, refused to continue the presidential
tradition of proclaiming Gay Pride Month, and passed legislation effectively
violating privacy and other freedoms."

"John Harlow" wrote in message
...

No, it is a desire to control an individual's choice as to who they can
marry. It's none of Bush's damn business who I, you or anybody else
choose to marry.


It places no restrictions on who anybody can marry.

"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message
k.net...

"John Harlow" wrote in message
...

No, it is a desire to control an individual's choice as to who they can
marry. It's none of Bush's damn business who I, you or anybody else
choose to marry.


It places no restrictions on who anybody can marry.


I sure hope you look out for other traffic better than you look out for this
country's freedoms.

Your politics gives you a whopping blind spot, and there is a torpedo
heading right toward you.

"Peter Gottlieb" wrote in message
et...

I sure hope you look out for other traffic better than you look out for
this country's freedoms.

Your politics gives you a whopping blind spot, and there is a torpedo
heading right toward you.

You're mistaken, I have no blind spot.

"John Harlow" wrote in message
...
C J Campbell wrote:
"John Harlow" wrote in message
...

Bush's attempts to legislate morality.

Oh? I suppose you could suggest what some of these attempts were?

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/relea...0040224-2.html

This appears to be an attempt to prevent others from legislating
morality, or simply imposing their version of morality from the
judicial bench.


No, it is a desire to control an individual's choice as to who they can
marry. It's none of Bush's damn business who I, you or anybody else
choose
to marry.

As a Mormon, I find blaming this view on Bush as extremely laughable.

In article , John Harlow says...
No, it is a desire to control an individual's choice as to who they can
marry. It's none of Bush's damn business who I, you or anybody else choose
to marry.

Then I suppose it's OK for someone to choose to marry young boys as NAMBLA
supports, or young girls ,or 2 women or 10 women or your favorite sheep
BAAAbara or a goat or your Sister etc. I wonder just who's business it is to
prevent those marriages or are all those marriages OK in your eyes ? Do you have
any boundaries? and if so why is it any of your damn business?

Chuck S