![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ed Rasimus" wrote in message ... Yes. It wouldn't take very long to list all of the military bases closed in the last 25 years, which would quickly relate to a whole bunch of no longer needed airspace and training routes. There used to be a Michigamee MOA just west of Sawyer AFB. The base is now closed and the MOA no longer exists. Coincidence? Most military training airspace is open for transit when not in use. What SUA is nor open for transit when not in use? In other words, ATC can authorize passage if the area is not "HOT". ATC may be able to authorize passage if the area IS "hot", if it's not hot authorization is not needed. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 20:02:28 GMT, "Steven P. McNicoll"
wrote: "Ed Rasimus" wrote in message .. . Yes. It wouldn't take very long to list all of the military bases closed in the last 25 years, which would quickly relate to a whole bunch of no longer needed airspace and training routes. There used to be a Michigamee MOA just west of Sawyer AFB. The base is now closed and the MOA no longer exists. Coincidence? My point, exactly. Most military training airspace is open for transit when not in use. What SUA is nor open for transit when not in use? Restricted and prohibited. Prohibited is open never and restricted requires you to get approval prior to filing through. In other words, ATC can authorize passage if the area is not "HOT". ATC may be able to authorize passage if the area IS "hot", if it's not hot authorization is not needed. Don't go blundering through R-18xx or whatever simply because it isn't NOTAM'd as active. I think we're parsing a bit here. Bottom line, responding to the original poster, is that special use airspace is a huge range of options and no, it doesn't simply fall into a never ending demand from that nasty ol' military to inconvenience Joe Bagadonutz in his Cessna enroute from Norton's Corner to Punkin Center for a donut. Ed Rasimus Fighter Pilot (USAF-Ret) "When Thunder Rolled" www.thunderchief.org www.thundertales.blogspot.com |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ed Rasimus" wrote in message ... Restricted and prohibited. Prohibited is open never and restricted requires you to get approval prior to filing through. Approval is required only when it's hot. Don't go blundering through R-18xx or whatever simply because it isn't NOTAM'd as active. Why not? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 23:40:45 GMT, "Steven P. McNicoll"
wrote: "Ed Rasimus" wrote in message .. . Restricted and prohibited. Prohibited is open never and restricted requires you to get approval prior to filing through. Approval is required only when it's hot. If you check the FLIP (or civil equivalent) you'll find that some restricted airspace is "always active" while others are activated when needed. Usually you can file IFR for the route around and then request transit enroute. Bottom line is that restricted airspace can vary considerably. Don't go blundering through R-18xx or whatever simply because it isn't NOTAM'd as active. Why not? Because those nasty folks at the FAA will take your license away if you survive the experience. Typically the pubs will tell you the hours of operation for a chunk of airspace. And, don't think that simply because ATC gave you a clearance along a route that goes through an R-xxxx that it is "cold". I remember (long ago in a galaxy far, far away) getting an IFR cleance at FL 180 along a route from LAS to FAT. Problem was that the route had an MEA of FL 240 and was published in those days with the note on the map of "breaks in radio and radar coverage along this segment". Blundering along badly iced up, I was astonishe to break into a open hole in the clouds and find some very significant Sierra Nevada mountains poking their granite heads up to my altitude. ATC didn't really catch that one. I've been in a lot of R-xxxx space and encountered Farmer Jones cruising along VFR, fat, dumb, happy and endangered. Ed Rasimus Fighter Pilot (USAF-Ret) "When Thunder Rolled" www.thunderchief.org www.thundertales.blogspot.com |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ed Rasimus" wrote in message ... If you check the FLIP (or civil equivalent) you'll find that some restricted airspace is "always active" while others are activated when needed. Usually you can file IFR for the route around and then request transit enroute. Bottom line is that restricted airspace can vary considerably. Quite true, nevertheless approval is required only when it's hot. Because those nasty folks at the FAA will take your license away if you survive the experience. Survive? What are the hazards of flying in a cold restricted area? The FAA isn't going to take away anybody's license for doing so. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Sells-Out California Pilots in Military Airspace Grab? | Larry Dighera | Instrument Flight Rules | 12 | April 26th 04 06:12 PM |
AOPA Sells-Out California Pilots in Military Airspace Grab? | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 12 | April 26th 04 06:12 PM |
bush rules! | Be Kind | Military Aviation | 53 | February 14th 04 04:26 PM |
12 Dec 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News | Otis Willie | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 12th 03 11:01 PM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |