A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

The Latest Military Airspace Grab: 700 Square Miles!



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 14th 05, 08:02 PM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Ed Rasimus" wrote in message
...

Yes. It wouldn't take very long to list all of the military bases
closed in the last 25 years, which would quickly relate to a whole
bunch of no longer needed airspace and training routes.


There used to be a Michigamee MOA just west of Sawyer AFB. The base is now
closed and the MOA no longer exists. Coincidence?



Most military training airspace is open for transit when not in use.


What SUA is nor open for transit when not in use?



In other words, ATC can authorize passage if the area is not "HOT".


ATC may be able to authorize passage if the area IS "hot", if it's not hot
authorization is not needed.


  #2  
Old February 14th 05, 11:26 PM
Ed Rasimus
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 20:02:28 GMT, "Steven P. McNicoll"
wrote:


"Ed Rasimus" wrote in message
.. .

Yes. It wouldn't take very long to list all of the military bases
closed in the last 25 years, which would quickly relate to a whole
bunch of no longer needed airspace and training routes.


There used to be a Michigamee MOA just west of Sawyer AFB. The base is now
closed and the MOA no longer exists. Coincidence?


My point, exactly.

Most military training airspace is open for transit when not in use.


What SUA is nor open for transit when not in use?


Restricted and prohibited. Prohibited is open never and restricted
requires you to get approval prior to filing through.

In other words, ATC can authorize passage if the area is not "HOT".


ATC may be able to authorize passage if the area IS "hot", if it's not hot
authorization is not needed.


Don't go blundering through R-18xx or whatever simply because it isn't
NOTAM'd as active.

I think we're parsing a bit here. Bottom line, responding to the
original poster, is that special use airspace is a huge range of
options and no, it doesn't simply fall into a never ending demand from
that nasty ol' military to inconvenience Joe Bagadonutz in his Cessna
enroute from Norton's Corner to Punkin Center for a donut.




Ed Rasimus
Fighter Pilot (USAF-Ret)
"When Thunder Rolled"
www.thunderchief.org
www.thundertales.blogspot.com
  #3  
Old February 14th 05, 11:40 PM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Ed Rasimus" wrote in message
...

Restricted and prohibited. Prohibited is open never and restricted
requires you to get approval prior to filing through.


Approval is required only when it's hot.



Don't go blundering through R-18xx or whatever simply because it isn't
NOTAM'd as active.


Why not?


  #4  
Old February 15th 05, 12:02 AM
Ed Rasimus
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 23:40:45 GMT, "Steven P. McNicoll"
wrote:


"Ed Rasimus" wrote in message
.. .

Restricted and prohibited. Prohibited is open never and restricted
requires you to get approval prior to filing through.


Approval is required only when it's hot.


If you check the FLIP (or civil equivalent) you'll find that some
restricted airspace is "always active" while others are activated when
needed. Usually you can file IFR for the route around and then request
transit enroute. Bottom line is that restricted airspace can vary
considerably.



Don't go blundering through R-18xx or whatever simply because it isn't
NOTAM'd as active.


Why not?


Because those nasty folks at the FAA will take your license away if
you survive the experience. Typically the pubs will tell you the hours
of operation for a chunk of airspace. And, don't think that simply
because ATC gave you a clearance along a route that goes through an
R-xxxx that it is "cold".

I remember (long ago in a galaxy far, far away) getting an IFR cleance
at FL 180 along a route from LAS to FAT. Problem was that the route
had an MEA of FL 240 and was published in those days with the note on
the map of "breaks in radio and radar coverage along this segment".
Blundering along badly iced up, I was astonishe to break into a open
hole in the clouds and find some very significant Sierra Nevada
mountains poking their granite heads up to my altitude. ATC didn't
really catch that one.

I've been in a lot of R-xxxx space and encountered Farmer Jones
cruising along VFR, fat, dumb, happy and endangered.


Ed Rasimus
Fighter Pilot (USAF-Ret)
"When Thunder Rolled"
www.thunderchief.org
www.thundertales.blogspot.com
  #5  
Old February 15th 05, 12:25 AM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Ed Rasimus" wrote in message
...

If you check the FLIP (or civil equivalent) you'll find that some
restricted airspace is "always active" while others are activated when
needed. Usually you can file IFR for the route around and then request
transit enroute. Bottom line is that restricted airspace can vary
considerably.


Quite true, nevertheless approval is required only when it's hot.



Because those nasty folks at the FAA will take your license away if
you survive the experience.


Survive? What are the hazards of flying in a cold restricted area? The FAA
isn't going to take away anybody's license for doing so.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Sells-Out California Pilots in Military Airspace Grab? Larry Dighera Instrument Flight Rules 12 April 26th 04 06:12 PM
AOPA Sells-Out California Pilots in Military Airspace Grab? Larry Dighera Piloting 12 April 26th 04 06:12 PM
bush rules! Be Kind Military Aviation 53 February 14th 04 04:26 PM
12 Dec 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News Otis Willie Naval Aviation 0 December 12th 03 11:01 PM
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools RT Military Aviation 104 September 25th 03 03:17 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:27 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.